01123132

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2095-11

http://scholar.google.com...dran&publication_year=2009

The Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) uses performance models to predict cracking and rutting in flexible pavements. A unique mechanism controls the initiation and accumulation of each distress, but each mechanism can have several causes. Axle repetitions and loads are the main causes of all load-related distress types. MEPDG incorporates axle load spectra to characterize axle loading for a site and uses them to calculate pavement response and damage accumulation. These load distributions have a bimodal shape, and a mixture of two continuous distributions can be used to model them. In this paper, closed-form solutions are developed to estimate the characteristics of a mixture of bimodal axle load distributions. The observed axle load spectra from 14 sites in different states were used to relate load distribution characteristics to predicted flexible pavement performance. The overall mean and other characteristics of a bimodal axle load distribution explained the variations in expected flexible pavement performance. Cracking, surface rutting, and ride quality are related to the fourth root of the fourth moment of axle load distributions. Rutting in the hot-mix asphalt layer is strongly associated with the overall mean, but in base and subbase layers it is related to the 95th percentile load of axle load spectra. These findings imply that cracking, rutting, and roughness growth in flexible pavements are caused mainly by axle load distributions having heavier tails with infrequent extreme loads. Heavier loads appear to cause more cracking; a higher number of load repetitions is more critical in developing additional surface rutting in flexible pavements.

01145025

09-3182

English

pp 101-114

2009

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309126328

Print

Figures (10) ; References (19) ; Tables (2)

Axle loads; Flexible pavements; Hot mix asphalt; Load transfer; Pavement cracking; Pavement design; Pavement distress; Pavement performance; Ride quality; Roughness; Rutting

Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Design; Highways; Pavements; I22: Design of Pavements, Railways and Guideways

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 30 2009 7:35PM

• Calibration of Flexible Pavement in Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide for Washington State
• Combined Effect of Moving Wheel Loading and Three-Dimensional Contact Stresses on Perpetual Pavement Responses
• Comparison of Georgia Department of Transportation Design Procedure with Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design
• Degree of Influence of Active Fillers on Properties of Recycled Mixes with Foamed Asphalt
• Design of Tie Bars in Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Considering Nonlinear Temperature Variations
• Development of a Permanent Deformation Model of Asphalt Mixtures for South Korean Pavement Design Guide
• Estimation of Truck Traffic Inputs for Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design in California
• Finite Element Model Analysis of Thermal Stresses of Thick Airport Concrete Pavement Slabs
• Full-Depth Reclamation with Engineered Emulsion in Fairburn, Georgia
• Laboratory and Finite Element Evaluation of Joint Lockup
• Methodology to Predict Alligator Fatigue Cracking Distress Based on Asphalt Concrete Dynamic Modulus
• Profile Analysis of Arizona Specific Pavement Studies 5 Project
• Quieter Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements in Washington State
• Top-Down Cracking Predictions for Airfield Rigid Pavements