TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Investigation of Planning Priority of Joint Activities in Household Activity-Scheduling Process

Accession Number:

01128684

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/Travel_Behavior_2009_Volume_1_162992.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780309142663

Abstract:

Operational models of the household activity-scheduling process have emerged recently. These models replicate the sequence of decisions that leads to observed patterns of human activities and travel, including which activities to conduct, with whom, for how long, at what time and location, and by what mode. Activity priority has been suggested as an important dimension in such scheduling models, particularly as a determinant for the choice and sequencing of activities. The importance of intrahousehold interactions, joint activities in particular, has led to a rapid expansion of research on this topic. However, within most scheduling models, joint activities have been addressed, at best, by assuming that they are preplanned relative to independent activities. Within this context, two important issues concerning the planning of joint activities are explored: the extent to which joint activities are preplanned and whether male and female householders share the same priority when scheduling joint activities. The data set used for the study was the 2003 Computerized Household Activity Scheduling Elicitor survey for Toronto, Ontario, Canada, which recorded information about when a particular activity was planned by respondents. In the analysis, bivariate probit models are estimated for two scheduling alternatives (impulsive or preplanned) for husband and wife. Overall, the empirical results highlight the need to move beyond static priority assumptions for determining the sequencing of activities to develop a behaviorally sound model for activity scheduling. Furthermore, differences in planning priority across individual participants should be taken into account.

Monograph Accession #:

01147881

Report/Paper Numbers:

09-2101

Language:

English

Authors:

Kang, Hejun
Scott, Darren M
Doherty, Sean T

Pagination:

pp 82-88

Publication Date:

2009

Serial:

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Issue Number: 2134
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

9780309142663

Media Type:

Print

Features:

Appendices (1) ; Figures (1) ; References (52) ; Tables (3)

Geographic Terms:

Subject Areas:

Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Jan 30 2009 6:26PM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: