|
Title: Empirical Evaluation of Alternative Approaches in Identifying Crash Hot Spots: Naive Ranking, Empirical Bayes, and Full Bayes Methods
Accession Number: 01123228
Record Type: Component
Record URL: Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Find a library where document is available Abstract: This study proposes a framework of a model-based hot spot identification method by applying full Bayes (FB) technique. In comparison with the state-of-the-art approach [i.e., empirical Bayes method (EB)], the advantage of the FB method is the capability to seamlessly integrate prior information and all available data into posterior distributions on which various ranking criteria could be based. With intersection crash data collected in Singapore, an empirical analysis was conducted to evaluate the following six approaches for hot spot identification: (a) naive ranking using raw crash data, (b) standard EB ranking, (c) FB ranking using a Poisson-gamma model, (d) FB ranking using a Poisson-lognormal model, (e) FB ranking using a hierarchical Poisson model, and (f) FB ranking using a hierarchical Poisson (AR-1) model. The results show that (a) when using the expected crash rate–related decision parameters, all model-based approaches perform significantly better in safety ranking than does the naive ranking method, and (b) the FB approach using hierarchical models significantly outperforms the standard EB approach in correctly identifying hazardous sites.
Monograph Title: Monograph Accession #: 01138796
Report/Paper Numbers: 09-1065
Language: English
Authors: Huang, HelaiChin, Hoong ChorHaque, M MazharulPagination: pp 32-41
Publication Date: 2009
ISBN: 9780309126182
Media Type: Print
Features: Figures
(6)
; References
(30)
; Tables
(1)
TRT Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Geographic Terms: Subject Areas: Data and Information Technology; Highways; Safety and Human Factors; I81: Accident Statistics
Files: TRIS, TRB, ATRI
Created Date: Jan 30 2009 5:17PM
More Articles from this Serial Issue:
|