01088873

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2060-09

http://scholar.google.com...berg&publication_year=2008

A W-beam guardrail is often used to protect motorists from steep roadside slopes adjacent to high-speed roadways. Although previously designed systems have demonstrated acceptable safety performance, the long posts and half-post spacing have proven to be costly and introduce maintenance challenges. Using longer posts is more economical to users than having a system with posts installed at half-post spacing. Furthermore, the improved redirective capacity of the Midwest Guardrail System (MGS) provides the opportunity to eliminate the need for half-post spacing and thereby greatly reduces the cost of placing a barrier at the slope break point. A stiffened version of the MGS was developed for use adjacent to steep roadside slopes. The new design incorporates 2,743-mm (9-ft) long posts with 1,905-mm (75-in.) spacing. With the top of the W-beam mounted at a height of 787 mm (31 in.), this guardrail was successfully crash tested according to the currently proposed NCHRP Report 350 Update safety performance evaluation criteria. Hence, the stiffened MGS guardrail design with full post spacing is acceptable for use on the National Highway System. This new guardrail design will provide a safe and economical alternative for use along highways with steep slopes very close to the travelway.

01114752

English

pp 74-83

2008

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309113304

Print

Figures (5) ; Photos (14) ; References (19) ; Tables (3)

Crash tests; Design; Guardrails; Highway safety; Posts; Roadside; Slopes; Spacing

NCHRP Report 350

Steep slopes; W-beam guardrail

Design; Highways; Research; Safety and Human Factors; I85: Safety Devices used in Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB

Jan 29 2008 5:34PM

• Assessment of Sag Curve Design Criteria Considering Modern Headlamp Performance
• Community Context and Strip Mall Retail: Public Response to the Roadside Landscape
• Construction Specification Framework for Utility Installations
• Culvert Hydraulics: Comparison of Current Computer Models and Recommended Improvements
• Determining the Length of the Right-Turn Lane at a Signalized Intersection
• Development of a Tool for Utility Conflict Data Management in the Project Development Process
• Do Context-Sensitive Solutions Really Work?
• Effect of Median Design on Rural Freeway Safety: Flush Medians with Concrete Barriers and Depressed Medians
• From Arterial to Asset: Examining the Role of the Multiway Boulevard in Coordinated Transportation and Land Use Planning
• Length Requirements for New Single-Arc Unsymmetrical Vertical Curve: Crest Type
• Overland Flow Time of Concentration on Very Flat Terrains
• Safety Evaluation and Improvements for Highway Intersections
• Safety Grates for Cross-Drainage Culverts
• State of the Practice of Cable Barrier Systems
• Students’ Perceptions of Difficulties in Cycling to School in Urban and Suburban Taiwan
• Three-Dimensional, Probabilistic Highway Design: Sight Distance Application
• Two-Level Signalized Intersection