01088875

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2060-04

http://scholar.google.com...lond&publication_year=2008

Although median barriers are an absolute means of preventing drivers from crossing road medians and colliding with vehicles moving in the opposite direction, they may cause additional crashes. This perhaps complex safety effect of median barriers has not been investigated well. Being able to predict the safety impact of most types of median barriers on rural freeways is becoming more desirable because some state departments of transportation plan to expand many of their four-lane rural freeways to six lanes to accommodate increases in traffic volume. Realistic crash prediction models sensitive to the median design would provide the needed guidance useful in designing adequate median treatments on widened freeways. The impact of median designs on crash frequency was investigated in this study through negative binomial regression and before-and-after studies based on data collected in eight participating states. The impact on crash severity was investigated with a logit model. The separate effects of changes in median geometry were quantified for single-vehicle, multiple-vehicle same direction, and multiple-vehicle opposite direction crashes. The results were significantly different and indicated that reducing the median width without adding barriers (the remaining median width is still reasonably wide) increases the severity of crashes, particularly opposite direction crashes. Further, reducing the median and installing concrete barriers eliminates opposite direction crashes but doubles the frequency of single-vehicle crashes and tends to lessen the frequency of same direction crashes. The crash severity also tends to increase.

01114752

English

pp 29-37

2008

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309113304

Print

Figures (1) ; References (12) ; Tables (7)

Barriers (Roads); Before and after studies; Crash rates; Crash severity; Design; Freeways; Highway safety; Logits; Median barriers; Medians; Multiple vehicle crashes; Rural areas; Single vehicle crashes; Traffic crashes; Traffic safety

Concrete barriers; Depressed medians; Negative binomial regression

Design; Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Safety and Human Factors; I21: Planning of Transport Infrastructure; I82: Accidents and Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 29 2008 4:34PM

• Assessment of Sag Curve Design Criteria Considering Modern Headlamp Performance
• Community Context and Strip Mall Retail: Public Response to the Roadside Landscape
• Construction Specification Framework for Utility Installations
• Culvert Hydraulics: Comparison of Current Computer Models and Recommended Improvements
• Determining the Length of the Right-Turn Lane at a Signalized Intersection
• Development of a Tool for Utility Conflict Data Management in the Project Development Process
• Do Context-Sensitive Solutions Really Work?
• From Arterial to Asset: Examining the Role of the Multiway Boulevard in Coordinated Transportation and Land Use Planning
• Length Requirements for New Single-Arc Unsymmetrical Vertical Curve: Crest Type
• Midwest Guardrail System Adjacent to a 2:1 Slope
• Overland Flow Time of Concentration on Very Flat Terrains
• Safety Evaluation and Improvements for Highway Intersections
• Safety Grates for Cross-Drainage Culverts
• State of the Practice of Cable Barrier Systems
• Students’ Perceptions of Difficulties in Cycling to School in Urban and Suburban Taiwan
• Three-Dimensional, Probabilistic Highway Design: Sight Distance Application
• Two-Level Signalized Intersection