01091562

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2072-14

http://scholar.google.com...Kloe&publication_year=2008

The gap between public transport vehicles and platforms is an important factor in the accessibility of public transport. Many of the efforts to increase accessibility are directed at minimizing this gap, both horizontally and vertically. There is a general idea of the widths and heights that are completely unacceptable (15 cm × 15 cm being too much, for example), but there is much less of an idea of what type of gap is acceptable without aids such as lifts and ramps. It is essential to know how much can be achieved by narrowing the gap; that is, which types of disability and mobility aids will be accommodated, and how many disabled will benefit from a specific reduction of the gap. At the request of the Dutch National Office for Accessibility, the Delft University of Technology performed laboratory experiments to gain quantitative insights into this topic. For these experiments, a standard platform was built in a laboratory hall. A number of platforms representing public transport vehicles were placed along this pier. These were positioned at different combinations of horizontal and vertical distances. Persons with physical disabilities were invited to test the different gaps. In the analysis of the testing results, the relation between disability, mobility aid, and gap size was investigated. The results of the study revealed that the 2-cm × 2-cm gap was hardly a problem, whereas the 10 cm × 10 cm gap constituted a serious problem for more than half of the participants. Access for nearly all requires a gap size no larger than 5 cm × 2 cm. Especially in bus transport, this is hardly feasible. Therefore, vehicles will need ramps as a standard provision.

01116584

English

pp 131-138

2008

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309113472

Print

Figures (5) ; Photos (8) ; References (12) ; Tables (2)

Accessibility; Barrier free design; Bus transit; Experiments; Persons with disabilities; Public transit; Ramps; Transit buses

Dutch National Office for Accessibility

Gaps (Vehicle/platform)

Public Transportation; Safety and Human Factors; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 29 2008 3:48PM

• Bus Rapid Transit Systems in Latin America and Asia: Results and Difficulties in 11 Cities
• Bus-Only Shoulders in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Minnesota
• Constructing an Automated Bus Origin–Destination Matrix Using Farecard and Global Positioning System Data in São Paulo, Brazil
• Farecard Passenger Flow Model at Chicago Transit Authority, Illinois
• Full-Featured Bus Rapid Transit in San Francisco, California: Toward a Comprehensive Planning Approach and Evaluation Framework
• Improving Bus Passenger Transfers on Road Segments Through Online Operational Tactics
• Integrated Passenger Information System for Multimodal Trip Planning
• Intermittent and Dynamic Transit Lanes: Melbourne, Australia, Experience
• Microscopic Simulation Approach to Effectiveness Analysis of Transit Signal Priority for Bus Rapid Transit: A Case Study in Beijing
• Modeling the Factors Affecting Bus Stop Dwell Time: Use of Automatic Passenger Counting, Automatic Fare Counting, and Automatic Vehicle Location Data
• Performance Metrics and Data Mining for Assessing Schedule Qualities in Paratransit
• Potential Mode Shift from Transit to Single-Occupancy Vehicles on a High-Occupancy Toll Lane
• Safety Assessment of Different In-Vehicle Interface Designs for Bus Collision Warning Systems
• Transit Extraboard Management: Optimum Sizing and Strategies