01099342

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2071-06

http://scholar.google.com...+Cao&publication_year=2008

The study presented in this paper is a continuous effort following the authors’ previous studies to estimate the capacity of U-turn movements at unsignalized intersections. The objective of this study is to estimate the capacity of U-turn movements at unsignalized intersections on four-lane divided roads. The study focuses on several issues that have not been addressed in the previous studies. These issues include (a) the impedance effects of minor movements, (b) conflicting traffic volume, and (c) shared-lane capacity of the major street exclusive left-turn lane. To achieve the research objective, traffic data were collected at six median openings in the Tampa Bay area of Florida. The "Highway Capacity Manual" (HCM) capacity estimation method was tested against capacity measured in the field using Kyte’s method. It was found that the HCM method provides reasonable capacity estimates for U-turn movements at unsignalized intersections. It was also found that the HCM shared-lane capacity model overestimates the capacity of the exclusive left-turn lane, which major street left-turning vehicles share with U-turning vehicles. A linear regression model was developed to estimate the capacity of the shared left-turn lane and to quantify the effects of U-turning vehicles on the capacity of an exclusive left-turn lane. It was found that the capacity of the exclusive left-turn lane decreases with an increase in the major street traffic volume, the major street right-turn volume, and the percentage of U-turning vehicles at the exclusive left-turn lane. Assuming that the major street right-turn traffic volume is 85 vehicles per hour (veh/h) and the conflicting major street through traffic volume is 1,000 veh/h, increasing the percentage of U-turning vehicles from 10% to 50% will reduce the capacity of the exclusive left-turn lane from 290 veh/h to 250 veh/h, which accounts for about a 14% capacity reduction.

01118256

English

pp 44-51

2008

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309113465

Print

Figures (4) ; References (14) ; Tables (3)

Divided highways; Estimating; Four lane highways; Highway capacity; Left turn lanes; Traffic volume; U turns; Unsignalized intersections

Highway Capacity Manual

Tampa (Florida)

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; I73: Traffic Control

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 29 2008 3:36PM

• Analysis and Modeling of Automobile Users’ Perceptions of Quality of Service on Urban Streets
• Calibration Potential of Common Analytical and Microsimulation Roundabout Models: New England Case Study
• Capacity Reduction at Incidents: Empirical Data Collected from a Helicopter
• Control-Type Selection at Isolated Intersections Based on Control Delay Under Various Demand Levels
• Default Values for Highway Capacity and Level-of-Service Analyses
• Delay at Unsignalized Intersections
• Driver Behavior and Gap-Acceptance Characteristics at Roundabouts in California
• Implementing Actuated Signal-Controlled Intersection Capacity Analysis with Pedestrians
• Inclement Weather Impacts on Freeway Traffic Stream Behavior
• Indicators of Performance on Two-Lane Rural Highways: Empirical Investigation
• Microscopic and Macroscopic Approaches to Delay Estimation with Oversaturated Conditions
• Modeling Left-Turn Blockage and Capacity at Signalized Intersection with Short Left-Turn Bay
• Multimodal Level of Service for Urban Streets
• Testing Incremental Queue Accumulation Method Using Lankershim Boulevard NGSIM Data Set: A Replacement for HCM Signalized Intersection Uniform Delay and Queue Method in Los Angeles, California