|
Title: Probe Vehicle Runs or Loop Detectors? Effect of Detector Spacing and Sample Size on Accuracy of Freeway Congestion Monitoring
Accession Number: 01049554
Record Type: Component
Record URL: Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Find a library where document is available Abstract: Freeway congestion monitoring can be based either on sampling-based methods, such as probe vehicle runs, or on continuous data from loop detector infrastructure. Sample size, in terms of the number of days sampled, affects the accuracy of sampling-based methods; detector spacing or detector density affects the accuracy of the detector-based method. This paper presents an empirical model of the effect of the two parameters—sample size and detector spacing—on the accuracy of both methods in estimating the annual average of three congestion parameters: total delay, average duration of congestion, and average spatial extent of congestion. The model is developed with data from four urban freeway corridors in California. Among other conclusions, the model predicts that to measure the congestion parameters with 10% error, 4 to 6 days’ worth of good probe vehicle data or loop detector data with half-mile spacing is needed. The proposed model facilitates comparison of the two alternatives in regard to the cost for achieving the same target accuracy. The result can also be used as a guide to determine the sample size or detector spacing in planning new congestion monitoring.
Monograph Title: Monograph Accession #: 01084472
Language: English
Authors: Kwon, JaimyoungPetty, KarlVaraiya, Pravin PPagination: pp 57-63
Publication Date: 2007
ISBN: 9780309104388
Media Type: Print
Features: Figures
(5)
; References
(7)
; Tables
(2)
TRT Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Geographic Terms: Subject Areas: Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; I73: Traffic Control
Files: TRIS, TRB, ATRI
Created Date: Feb 8 2007 5:54PM
More Articles from this Serial Issue:
|