01031139

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1946-11

http://scholar.google.com...rati&publication_year=2006

The results of a study to evaluate the existing South Carolina Department of Transportation (SCDOT) hot-mix asphalt quality assurance specification are presented. When the existing specification was developed, assumed values were used for the standard deviations needed to establish the specification limits. Acceptance test results from 39 different projects were analyzed to determine standard deviation values that were being obtained for asphalt content, air voids, voids in mineral aggregate, and density. For each project, standard deviation values were calculated for each lot, and these were then pooled to obtain a typical value for the project. The target miss variability, that is, the ability of contractors to center their processes on the target, was also determined for each acceptance characteristic. The project and target miss values were then used to establish a typical process standard deviation value for each of the four acceptance characteristics. All these standard deviation values proved to be smaller than those initially assumed and resulted in the SCDOT narrowing the specification limits for each of the acceptance characteristics. The project standard deviation values justified that these changes were made to reflect the actual variability that was present and not simply to tighten the specifications.

01031140

English

pp 92-98

2006

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

0309099544

Print

Figures (5) ; References (8) ; Tables (4)

Acceptance tests; Air voids; Asphalt content; Density; Hot mix asphalt; Quality assurance; Road construction; Specifications; Standard deviation

Testing variability; Voids in mineral aggregate

Construction; Highways; I50: Construction and Supervision of Construction

TRIS, TRB

Aug 22 2006 11:42AM

• Accuracy and Precision of Typical Quality Measures
• Comparative Analysis of Field Permeability Testing of Compacted Hot-Mix Ashpalt Pavements: Using Air and Water Permeameters
• Estimating Percent Within Limits for Skewed Populations
• Evaluation of Superpave Mix Design for Low-Volume Roads in New Jersey
• Evaluation of the Effect of Sampling Location on Laboratory-Measured Quality Control Parameters
• Field Trial of Infrared Joint Heater to Improve Longitudinal Joint Performance in New Hampshire
• Finite Difference Modeling of Misaligned Dowel Bars and Their Effects on Joint Performance
• Mathematical Modeling Procedures for Performance-Related Specifications
• Probabilistic Procedure for Analyzing Construction Pay Adjustment Systems
• Quality Assurance of Hot-Mix Asphalt: Comparison of Contractor Quality Control and Georgia Department of Transportation Data
• Quantification of Risk Cost Associated with Short-Term Warranty-Based Specifications for Pavements
• Quantity-Based Approach to Preliminary Cost Estimates for Highway Projects
• Rational Estimation of Construction Impact on Pavement Performance
• Sample Size Requirements for Seismic and Traditional Testing of Concrete Pavement Strength
• Seismic Testing to Determine Quality of Hot-Mix Asphalt
• Thermal Imaging of Hot-Mix Asphalt Paving Projects in Connecticut
• Thermal Imaging of Hot-Mix Paving Operations for Quality Assessment: State of the Practice in Texas
• Visually Improving Construction Contract Administration