01023805

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1940-14

http://scholar.google.com...jreh&publication_year=2005

A study conducted in 2001 on the heavily instrumented Virginia Smart Road measured pavement responses to a new generation of single wide-base tire (445/50R22.5) and to dual tires (275/80R22.5). The new single wide-base tire has a wider tread and a greater load-carrying capacity than conventional wide-base tires. The potential fatigue damage resulting from different tire configurations was evaluated. After successful field testing, a finite element (FE) parametric study was conducted to investigate different failure mechanisms that were not evaluated in the field. In this study, dual tires and two new generations of wide-base tires (445/50R22.5 and 455/55R22.5) were evaluated. The main difference between the two generations of wide-base tires is that the 455/55R22.5 is wider than the 445/50R22.5; hence, it further reduces the contact stress at the pavement surface under the same nominal tire pressure. In the developed FE models, geometry and dimensions were selected to simulate accurately the axle configurations typically used in North America; actual tire tread sizes and applicable contact pressure for each tread were considered; laboratory-measured pavement material properties were incorporated; and models were calibrated and properly validated against stress and strain measurements obtained from the experimental program. Four failure mechanisms were considered: fatigue cracking, primary rutting, secondary rutting, and top-down cracking. Results indicated that the new generations of wide-base tire would cause the same or relatively greater pavement damage than conventional dual tires. Because overall truck weight is reduced by approximately 450 kg when wide-base tires are used, it is reasonable to implement the load limits currently applied to the dual-tire assembly on the 455/55R22.5 wide-base tire.

01023790

English

pp 125-135

2005

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

0309094151

Print

Figures (5) ; References (14) ; Tables (4)

Failure; Fatigue cracking; Field tests; Finite element method; Mathematical models; Rutting

Contact stresses; Dual tires; Fatigue damage; Pavement damage; Top down cracking (Pavements); Wide base tires

Design; Highways; Pavements; I22: Design of Pavements, Railways and Guideways; I23: Properties of Road Surfaces

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

May 7 2006 6:05PM

• Accuracy of Ground-Penetrating Radar for Estimating Rigid and Flexible Pavement Layer Thicknesses
• Analysis of Long-Term Effectiveness of Thin Hot-Mix Asphaltic Concrete Overlay Treatments
• Assessment of Aging at FHWA’s Pavement Testing Facility
• Developing Roadway Standards for Ride Quality from the Customer’s Perspective
• Development of a Crack Type Index
• Evaluation of Top-Down Cracks in Asphalt Pavements by Using a Self-Calibrating Ultrasonic Technique
• Incorporating Variability into Pavement Performance, Life-Cycle Cost Analysis, and Performance-Based Specification Pay Factors
• Pavement Management System Based on Financial Consequence
• Prediction of Pavement Crack Initiation from In-Service Pavements: A Duration Model Approach
• Rut Initiation Mechanisms in Asphalt Mixtures as Generated Under Accelerated Pavement Testing
• Statistical Analysis of Automated Versus Manual Pavement Condition Surveys
• Superaccelerated Pavement Testing on Full-Scale Concrete Slabs
• Use of Pavement Management System Data to Monitor Performance of Pavements Under Warranty
• Wavelet-Based Multiresolution Analysis of Pavement Profiles as a Diagnostic Tool
• Wavelet-Based Pavement Distress Classification