TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Cold In-Place Recycling and Full-Depth Reclamation Projects by Nevada Department of Transportation: State of the Practice
Cover of Cold In-Place Recycling and Full-Depth Reclamation Projects by Nevada Department of Transportation: State of the Practice

Accession Number:

01029686

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Public/Blurbs/158539.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309099587

Abstract:

One of the biggest challenges that public agencies face is how to optimize available funding. With the price of bituminous materials 70% higher than 2 years ago and increased demand for capacity improvement proj¬ects, it is more important than ever to use in-place materials when rehabilitating pavement structural sections. Cold in-place recycling (CIR) and full-depth reclamation (FDR) are two pavement rehabilitation strategies that the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) has used for more than 20 years. These strategies have allowed NDOT to save more than $600M over the past 20 years compared with complete reconstruction costs. In addition, traffic interruptions are minimized during construction, and natural resources are preserved. According to the Highway Performance Monitoring System data, NDOT has the highest percentage of its combined National Highway System Interstate and other roadways rated in the “good” category. The reason for this achievement is that NDOT uses a proactive Pavement Management System (PMS) to prioritize its pavement preservation projects. A considerable amount of CIR and FDR rehabilitation work is performed in conjunction with the proactive PMS. Because these strategies are more cost-effective than overlay, mill and overlay, or reconstruction, NDOT can rehabilitate more roads with less money. This report will describe how to select, design, and construct successful CIR and FDR projects. The performances of the strategies are evaluated, and life-cycle cost analysis is developed to demonstrate the cost–benefit of CIR and FDR versus conventional rehabilitation strategies.

Monograph Accession #:

01033004

Language:

English

Authors:

Bemanian, Sohila
Polish, Patricia
Maurer, Gayle

Pagination:

pp 54-71

Publication Date:

2006

Serial:

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Issue Number: 1949
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

0309099587

Media Type:

Print

Features:

Figures (2) ; References (5) ; Tables (4)

Subject Areas:

Design; Finance; Highways; Maintenance and Preservation; Pavements; I22: Design of Pavements, Railways and Guideways; I23: Properties of Road Surfaces; I61: Equipment and Maintenance Methods

Files:

PRP, TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Mar 3 2006 11:06AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: