01020435

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1981-11

http://scholar.google.com...vans&publication_year=2006

Statewide multimodal transportation planning may be centralized through a single office or decentralized through separate modal agencies (e.g., aviation, transit, highway, port, rail, and toll agencies). To determine the value of each approach, representatives from 41 states were surveyed by questionnaire or telephone about the usefulness of centralized versus decentralized planning. Each approach offers benefits. Centralization provides consistency of modal plans, better modal coordination (including detection of modal conflicts earlier in the process), an ability to examine the entire transportation system holistically, collective attention brought to smaller modes that otherwise might be overlooked, economies of scale for service delivery and employee development, and a greater likelihood that long-range planning will be performed rather than eliminated by more immediate tasks. Decentralization, however, provides greater ease in obtaining modal support for a long-range plan (since the planners and implementers are in the same functional unit), greater ease of tapping mode-specific expertise, and an ability to focus on the most critical mode. External factors that may override the importance of either approach are mode-specific funding requirements, the increasing relevance of metropolitan planning organizations, and the fact that modal location in the same office is not synonymous with coordination. A subset of the free responses to the survey indicated that centralized multimodal planning can be beneficial but only if four constraints are met: modal staff work collaboratively, the centralized unit has funding or other authority, necessary mode-specific planning is not eliminated, and there is a clear linkage between this unit and the agencies that perform mode-specific planning such that the latter can implement the recommendations of the former.

01041099

English

pp 60-67

2006

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

0309099919

Print

Figures (2) ; References (9) ; Tables (2)

Aviation; Decentralization; Highways; Long range planning; Multimodal transportation; Ports; Public transit; Railroads; State departments of transportation; Surveys; Transportation planning

Centralized planning

Planning and Forecasting; Terminals and Facilities; Transportation (General); I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Mar 3 2006 10:59AM

• Access Management Plan and Program for Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area
• Advanced Activity-Based Models in Context of Planning Decisions
• Analysis of New Starts Project by Using Tour-Based Model of San Francisco, California
• Consensus Building in Transportation Planning Practice: Case Evaluation of Process and Outcomes
• Developing a Simple System for Conflict Management of Public Involvement
• Developing a Statewide Travel Demand Model from a Person-Based Time Series Household Survey
• Direct Demand Forecasting Model for Small Urban Communities Using Multiple Linear Regression
• Documenting America's National Park Roads and Parkways
• Financial Benefits of Early Acquisition of Transportation Right-of-Way
• Forecasting Traffic Impacts on a Citywide Street Network in the Absence of a Travel Demand Model
• Geography of Public Participation: Using Geographic Information Systems to Evaluate Public Outreach Program of Transportation Planning Studies
• I-285 Matrix Variegator: Practical Method for Developing Trip Tables for Simulation Modeling from Travel Demand Modeling Inputs
• Learning to Drive the Transportation System: Study of Training Needs of Metropolitan Planning Organization Participants in Florida
• Lifestyles, Residential Location Decisions, and Pedestrian and Transit Activity
• Modeling Time-of-Day Choice in Context of Tour- and Activity-Based Models
• Network Expansion Decision Making in Minnesota’s Twin Cities
• Oregon’s Transportation Planning Rule Goes into the Shop for Repairs
• Public Involvement Practices and Perspectives of Florida’s Metropolitan Planning Organizations
• Selection and Scheduling of Interdependent Transportation Projects with Island Models
• Service Times and Capacity at National Park Entrance Stations
• Summary of Recommendations from Travel Model Improvement Program's Peer Review Program
• Views of the Street: Using Community Surveys and Focus Groups to Inform Context-Sensitive Design