|
Title: Performance Comparison Between Artificial Neural Network and Analytical Models for Real-Time Cycle Length Design
Accession Number: 01025971
Record Type: Component
Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Abstract: A searching-free analytical procedure is mostly utilized with Adaptive Traffic Control Systems (ATCS) because of its short and stable computation time even though it suffers from feasibility limited to the designed conditions. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is a perceptual model, which may overcome the shortcomings of an analytical model. However, ANN was concerned about its sensitivity that may cause safety problems in the field. This paper presents performance comparison between an analytical model, a degree-of-saturation based cycle length design model of Cycle-Offset-Split-Models-Of-Seoul (COSMOS) and an ANN model developed for this study. Cycle lengths from these models were compared against the ones suggested by TRANSYT-7F and SYNCHRO at various demand levels. It was found that the ANN model provides with the optimal cycle lengths stably adjusted by the minimum, the maximum, and a cycle increment, while the analytical model promotes congestion at certain operational conditions considered in the test.
Monograph Title: Monograph Accession #: 01020180
Report/Paper Numbers: 06-2038
Language: English
Corporate Authors: Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Authors: Kim, Jin-TaeLee, JeongyoonChang, Myung-soonPagination: 22p
Publication Date: 2006
Conference:
Transportation Research Board 85th Annual Meeting
Location:
Washington DC, United States Media Type: CD-ROM
Features: Figures
(7)
; References
(21)
; Tables
(4)
TRT Terms: Identifier Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Subject Areas: Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Planning and Forecasting; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning
Source Data: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2006 Paper #06-2038
Files: TRIS, TRB
Created Date: Mar 3 2006 10:51AM
|