TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

COMMENTARY ON "MINORITIES AND PRIMARY VERSUS SECONDARY BELT USE ENFORCEMENT"
Cover of COMMENTARY ON "MINORITIES AND PRIMARY VERSUS SECONDARY BELT USE ENFORCEMENT"

Accession Number:

00987733

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/issn/00978515

Abstract:

The author comments on the paper "Minorities and Primary Versus Secondary Belt Use Enforcement" by D. Pruesser, M. Solomon, and L. Cosgrove, expands upon the paper's findings, and suggests some additional research. The paper concludes that primary enforcement (involving both laws and actual enforcement) is associated with substantially higher seat belt use rates among racial minorities (primarily African Americans and Hispanic Americans) without resulting in proportionally greater citation rates for these groups (relative to the citation rates for whites). This clearly seems to be the case, but there is more to the story. First, as Pruesser, Solomon and Cosgrove point out to some extent, blacks and Hispanics (compared with whites) also appear to be both more aware of changes in legislation and primary enforcement and have a greater "respect" for these changes in that they perceive that they will lead to a greater increase in the intensity of enforcement and the number of citations. At the same time, however, telephone surveys conducted by a variety of organizations in a variety of circumstances uniformly report that blacks and Hispanics also support primary laws and enforcement to a greater extent than whites and they are more likely to conclude that primary enforcement (or intensified enforcement) is the correct way to increase safety belt use. The author's commentary reviews briefly these issues of sensitivity and support and discusses implications for additional research that may be needed. Admittedly, the observations provided come from a mixture of studies of changes in laws and changes in levels of enforcement. However, they are relevant to the primary law issue in that they all relate to the measured support for such laws among minority communities.

Supplemental Notes:

Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved

Monograph Accession #:

00987728

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Nichols, J L

Pagination:

p. 30-32

Publication Date:

2005-1

Serial:

Transportation Research Circular

Issue Number: E-C072
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0097-8515

Conference:

Putting Research Into Action: A Symposium on the Implementation of Research-Based Impaired Driving Countermeasures

Location: Irvine, California , United States
Date: 2003-8-21 to 2003-8-23
Sponsors: Transportation Research Board; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; International Council on Alcohol, Drugs and Traffic Safety; and Transport Canada

Subject Areas:

Highways; Law; Research; Safety and Human Factors; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Mar 22 2005 12:00AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: