|
Title: B-NODE MODEL: NEW SUBAREA TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT MODEL & APPLICATION
Accession Number: 00939810
Record Type: Component
Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Abstract: For the past 50 years, ever since the traffic assignment process became computerized, practitioners have struggled with lumpy loadings around centroid connectors. The problem stems from loading all of the trips from zone A to zone B via the same centroid connector. Practitioners have solved this problem for subarea studies by using the Focus or Window options. This process is now totally computerized for a subarea and/or for the entire region, resulting in enormous savings in modeling man-hours. The "b-node model" is new software that reads a metropolitan planning organization (MPO) zone-level network (in a format such as MINUTP) and trip table and performs a subzone capacity restrained traffic assignment. Subzones are created automatically by the software during execution. The b-node of each zone centroid connector, for a portion of or for all of the region, becomes a subzone; and each zone can have up to 12 centroid connectors. The program subdivides the zone trip table into this subzone system defined by the network. This is done in one of three ways: based on subzone land activity, based on equal splits among each subzone per zone or based on the reciprocal of the centroid connector's link time. The network is then updated by renumbering zones/subzones and nodes to prevent overlapping of nodes and subzones and to account for up to 10,000 subzones and finally the traffic assignment is made, all within one pass on the computer. This model is used extensively by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) for the Location & Design Section of VDOT for doing traffic forecasts for their design work. Little manual adjustments are needed with this subzone assignment output. All connecting link volumes are much smoother along a corridor than with traditional assignments using zone loadings only. The major problem with zone assignments has always been with the lumpiness around where centroid connectors tie into the network. Even turning movements are better, meaning that they match ground counts better than zone assignments. Every place where detailed link volumes are needed is better. Several examples including statistics comparing the results of the MPO zone level process versus the b-node subzone level process are presented. They include a study for an entire suburban jurisdiction (Loudoun County), corridor studies, subarea studies, and intersection studies. Loudoun County was subdivided into 1500 subzones from 145 MPO zones, while still carrying the rest of the region at zone level. The results of subdividing the entire Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments region of 2191 zones into subzones is also presented.
Supplemental Notes: The CD-ROM contains the proceedings of the sixth, seventh and eighth conferences. The eighth conference proceedings were published in October 2001.
Language: English
Corporate Authors: Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Authors: Mann, W WEditors: Donnelly, RBennett, GPagination: p. 273-281
Publication Date: 2002
Conference:
Eighth TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods
Location:
Corpus Christi, Texas Features: Figures
(12)
; Tables
(1)
TRT Terms: Identifier Terms: Uncontrolled Terms: Geographic Terms: Subject Areas: Highways; Planning and Forecasting; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning
Files: TRIS, TRB
Created Date: Mar 21 2003 12:00AM
More Records from this Conference:
|