00935483

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1793-08

http://scholar.google.com...sman&publication_year=2002

The results of a real-world study comparing bus rail transit (BRT) with light rail transit (LRT) in the same corridor are highlighted. A major investment study (MIS)--environmental impact study (EIS) process was used, including community perspectives obtained from a significant outreach effort. In effect, this study represents a "plan-off" competition between the two modes, including ridership, cost-effectiveness, environmental impact, and community and political response. In 1994 the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission, predecessor agency to the current Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, environmentally cleared an Exposition Park Branch Line, which was an LRT branch line to the Los Angeles--Long Beach Blue Line. Because of financial constraints, the project languished until last year, when it was reconsidered through an MIS process for the Mid-City--Westside Transit Corridor Study. The MIS also called for a side-by-side comparison with BRT in the EIS--environmental impact review, which was publicly released on April 13, 2001. The findings to date indicate that LRT is environmentally superior to BRT (especially in relation to noise and traffic impacts) and has more new daily transit riders, whereas BRT is somewhat more cost-effective. From a community standpoint, LRT has generated more positive and negative reactions, perhaps because of the novelty of BRT to the general public in the western United States.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1793, Transit: Intermodal Facilities, Rail Transit, Commuter Rail, Light Rail Transit, Maintenance, and Ferry Transportation.

English

p. 55-61

2002

Transportation Research Record

0309077192

Figures (4) ; References (4) ; Tables (4)

Bus rapid transit; Cost effectiveness; Decision making; Environmental impact analysis; Environmental impacts; Light rail transit; Noise; Political factors; Public opinion; Ridership; Traffic

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Major investment study

Los Angeles County (California)

Environment; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; Society

TRIS, TRB

Dec 24 2003 12:00AM

• CHICAGO'S NORTH SIDE 'L': THE FIRST HUNDRED YEARS (WITH DISCUSSION)
• CREATING SYNERGY IN AND AROUND STATIONS: THREE STRATEGIES FOR ADDING VALUE
• EFFECT OF SKIP-STOP POLICY ON A KOREAN SUBWAY SYSTEM
• EFFECTS OF PEDESTRIAN TREATMENTS ON RISKY PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIOR
• ENCOURAGING KISS-AND-RIDE AT COMMUTER RAILROAD STATIONS
• FERRY SERVICE MARKET ANALYSIS: NATIONAL PARKS OF NEW YORK HARBOR
• HEURISTIC ANALYSIS OF IMPACTS OF COMMUTER RAIL STATION CONSOLIDATION ON PEDESTRIAN ACCESS
• MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL APPROACH FOR RECOVERY FROM DELAYS IN RAILWAY SYSTEMS
• NEED FOR A NEW COMMUTER CAR ENTRANCEWAY DESIGN FOR MIXED HIGH- AND LOW-LEVEL PLATFORMS
• ROLLING STOCK CORROSION CONTROL: AVAILABLE OPTIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
• SOCIOECONOMIC, COMMUNITY-BASED APPROACH FOR DEVELOPING INTEGRATED MASS TRANSIT SYSTEMS: APPLICATION TO CITY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
• TRAM-TRAIN: NEW PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM
• WASHINGTON STATE FERRIES' TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND FORECASTING ANALYSIS PROGRAMS: A 10-YEAR PERSPECTIVE