00814203

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1742-04

http://scholar.google.com...sman&publication_year=2001

The effects of train control strategies on the risks of railroad operations are examined. Analysis of a hypothetical 1800-km (1,200-mi) corridor identified the main factors that increase risks. Passenger traffic is the most important factor because the addition of passenger trains creates the possibility of catastrophic accidents with dozens of fatalities. Increasing the number of trains per day leads to more than proportional increases in the risks of collisions. Single-track operations are much more susceptible to collisions, whereas higher train speeds increase both the likelihood and the severity of the consequences of accidents if there is a signal overrun or a failure to obey a slow order. Positive train control (PTC) systems can reduce most, but not all, of the collisions and overspeed derailments, as improper train handling or equipment failure could still lead to accidents. Establishment of a digital communications link to the train should also allow the possibility for improved grade-crossing protection. For the hypothetical corridor, the potential benefits from improved grade-crossing protection were on the same order of magnitude as the predicted benefits from PTC systems. If new technologies are developed to detect broken rails, the digital communications link could also be used to implement immediate braking, thereby preventing some additional derailments. The risk-based approach demonstrated may provide a more complete assessment of rail risks than a methodology that estimates safety benefits based on documentation of accidents that might have been prevented if more advanced train control techniques had been in place. Risks include the possibility of catastrophic accidents, whether or not such accidents occurred recently. A causality-based methodology also allows greater flexibility in sensitivity analysis and in assessment of trends in traffic volume, traffic mix, and other factors.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1742, Intercity Passenger Rail; Freight Rail; and Track Design and Maintenance.

English

p. 25-33

2001

Transportation Research Record

030907200X

Figures (2) ; References (12) ; Tables (5)

Automatic train control; Crash severity; Crashes; Derailments; Detection and identification; Digital communication systems; Equipment; Failure; Fatalities; Grade crossing protection systems; High speed rail; Human error; Passenger traffic; Passenger trains; Positive train control; Railroad crashes; Railroad grade crossings; Railroad vehicle operations; Risk analysis; Schedules and scheduling; Single track; Train operations

Broken rails

Highways; Railroads; Safety and Human Factors

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jul 31 2001 12:00AM

• APPLICATION OF BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS TO THE PROPOSED CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL SYSTEM
• COMPATIBILITY AND CONSTRAINTS BETWEEN HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER TRAINS AND TRADITIONAL FREIGHT TRAINS
• CONCRETE SLAB TRACK STATE OF THE PRACTICE
• ESTIMATION OF INVESTMENT IN TRACK AND STRUCTURES NEEDED TO HANDLE 129 844-KG (286,000-LB) RAILCARS ON SHORT-LINE RAILROADS
• EVALUATION OF UNIAXIAL STRAIN TRANSDUCER FOR RAILROAD INFRASTRUCTURE
• FRANCHISING AND REFRANCHISING OF PASSENGER RAIL SERVICES IN BRITAIN
• FUNDAMENTAL NONLINEAR TRACK LOAD-DEFLECTION BEHAVIOR FOR CONDITION EVALUATION
• IMPACT OF NEW RAILWAY TECHNOLOGY ON GRAIN TRANSPORTATION IN WESTERN CANADA
• RAILROADS IN GREECE: HISTORY, CHARACTERISTICS, AND FORECASTS
• TRACK DEGRADATION ASSESSMENT USING GAGE RESTRAINT MEASUREMENTS