00968497

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1859-06

http://scholar.google.com...nold&publication_year=2003

The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) currently designs absorptive sound barriers with their entire face absorptive [noise reduction coefficient (NRC) of 0.8 or greater]. Using the Federal Highway Administration Traffic Noise Model, the sound level increases caused by three modifications to current VDOT practice were investigated: a more reflective barrier surface (NRC = 0.7), a 6-in. (15-cm) reflective cap, and a 2-ft (61-cm) reflective base. These increases were computed for receivers up to 40 ft (12.2 m) above the ground and 1,000 ft (305 m) behind the barrier. The computations included three barrier locations--barrier opposite receivers, barrier same side as receivers, and barriers on both sides--at several barrier heights and distances from the roadway. They also included two roadway widths and two traffic conditions, to span the extreme ranges of these variables. Results indicate that for a barrier opposite the receivers, the more reflective surface caused a maximum increase of 1.3 dB, the 2-ft (61-cm) reflective base caused a maximum increase of 1.7 dB, and all three modifications combined inflated this increase to 2.7 dB. For a barrier on the same side of the roadway as the receivers, no situations caused increases greater than 1 dB. Finally, for barriers on both sides of the roadway, the more reflective surface caused a maximum increase of 1.1 dB, and all three modifications combined inflated this increase to 1.5 dB. A table of resulting sound level increases for the full field of computed receivers--for the worst-case situations encountered in the computations--is included.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1859, Sustainability and Environmental Concerns in Transportation 2003.

English

p. 45-52

2003

Transportation Research Record

0309085969

Figures (3) ; Tables (3)

Design standards; Measurement; Noise barriers; Reflection; Sound absorption; Sound level

Noise reduction coefficient; Reflective bases; Reflective caps; Reflective surfaces

Virginia

Design; Environment; Highways; I20: Design and Planning of Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 7 2004 12:00AM

• ACOUSTICAL ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF PORTLAND (OREGON) INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT GROUND RUN-UP ENCLOSURE
• AVAILABILITY OF TRAVEL FORECASTING METHODS AND DATA FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
• COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE PLANNING IN THE DEVELOPING WORLD: CASE OF MEXICO CITY
• EQUITY ANALYSIS OF THE HOUSTON, TEXAS, QUICKRIDE PROJECT
• EVALUATING INDIRECT LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF A TOLL DISCOUNT PROPOSAL
• FLORIDA NOISE BARRIER EVALUATION AND COMPUTER MODEL VALIDATION
• FLORIDA'S EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: LAYING THE TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION
• JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTING INITIATIVES IN CALIFORNIA: REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT
• MAINSTREAMING PRICING ALTERNATIVES IN THE PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
• MEASURING ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AT STATE TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES
• MEASURING THE ROLE OF TRANSPORTATION IN FACILITATING WELFARE-TO-WORK TRANSITION: EVIDENCE FROM THREE CALIFORNIA COUNTIES
• PERFORMANCE OF NOISE BARRIERS WITH ABSORPTIVE EDGE TREATMENTS
• TRAFFIC NOISE MODEL VS. EXTREME TOPOGRAPHY