TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

EVALUATION OF CORSIM CAR-FOLLOWING MODEL BY USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM FIELD DATA

Accession Number:

00802589

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309066891

Abstract:

It has been recognized that CORSIM (and its constituent program, NETSIM) is one of the most widely used and effective computer programs for the simulation of traffic behavior on urban transportation networks. Its popularity is due in large part to the high level of detail incorporated into its modeling routines. However, the car-following models, used for the simulation of driver behavior in the program, have not been formally calibrated or validated. Since the model has performed well in a wide range of applications for so many years, it has always been assumed to have an implied validity. This study evaluated the NETSIM car-following models by comparing their results with field data. Car-following field data were collected using a new data collection system that incorporates new Global Positioning System and geographic information system technologies to improve the accuracy, ease, speed, and cost-effectiveness of car-following data collection activities. First, vehicle position and speed characteristics were collected under field conditions. Then simulated speeds and distances were based on identical lead vehicle actions using NETSIM car-following equations. Comparisons of simulated and field data were completed using both graphical and statistical methods. Although some differences were evident in the graphical comparisons, the graphs overall indicated a reasonable match between the field and simulated vehicle movements. Three statistical tests, including a goodness-of-fit test, appear to support these subjective conclusions. However, it was also found that definitive statistical conclusions were difficult to draw since no single test was able to compare the sets of speed and distance information on a truly impartial basis.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1710, Traffic Flow Theory and Highway Capacity 2000.

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Chundury, S
Wolshon, B

Pagination:

p. 114-121

Publication Date:

2000

Serial:

Transportation Research Record

Issue Number: 1710
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

0309066891

Features:

Figures (4) ; References (13) ; Tables (4)

Subject Areas:

Data and Information Technology; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; I71: Traffic Theory

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Nov 29 2000 12:00AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: