00781544

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1692-16

http://scholar.google.com...nell&publication_year=1999

A study was conducted to obtain visibility data for old and young subjects performing a pavement marking end detection task on a fully marked road under headlamp illumination conditions. A total of 20 healthy subjects (10 old and 10 young) were used. It was found that observer age had a highly significant effect on pavement marking visibility. The effect of headlamp illumination (high-beam versus low-beam) was found to be rather weak, probably because of the low-beam headlamp pattern, which favors the right-edge line. Pavement marking retroreflectivity was found to be significant at the levels investigated in the experiment. The new yellow dashed centerlines (tape) with a gap-to-stripe ratio of 9.1/3 had a retroreflectivity of R sub L = 222 mcd/sq m/lx and R sub L = 399 mcd/sq m/lx under the medium and high conditions, respectively. The new white edge lines (tape) had a retroreflectivity of R sub L = 268 mcd/sq m/lx and R sub L = 706 mcd/sq m/lx under the medium and high conditions, respectively. The average end detection distances ranging from 124.8 m (average preview time 5.1 s for 88.5 km/h) for the old group under low-beam illumination on the medium retroreflectivity road to 237.3 m (average preview time 9.7 s for 88.5 km/h) for the young group under high-beam illumination on the high retroreflectivity road may appear to be rather long. However, the reader should be aware that markings as bright as the ones used in this research are the exception instead of the rule in real-world driving situations. The aim of this study was to determine the end detection distances obtainable under fairly favorable pavement marking material conditions.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1692, Traffic Signing, Visibility, and Rail-Highway Grade Crossings.

English

p. 152-163

1999

Transportation Research Record

0309071151

Figures (5) ; References (12) ; Tables (3)

Age; Center lines; Edge lines; High beamed headlamps; Human subject testing; Low beamed headlamps; Night; Retroreflectivity; Road marking tapes; Visibility; Visibility distance; Whites; Yellow

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 28 2000 12:00AM

• ADVANCE WARNING FLASHERS: DO THEY IMPROVE SAFETY?
• BENEFIT SENSITIVITIES OF ADAPTIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL STRATEGIES AT ISOLATED TRAFFIC SIGNALS
• CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN MESSAGES FOR WORK ZONES: TIME OF DAY, DAYS OF WEEK, AND MONTH DATES
• COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RURAL STOP-CONTROLLED AND BEACON-CONTROLLED INTERSECTIONS
• DRIVER PREVIEW DISTANCES AT NIGHT BASED ON DRIVER EYE SCANNING RECORDINGS AS A FUNCTION OF PAVEMENT MARKING RETROREFLECTIVITIES
• DRIVER'S SPEED REDUCTION BEHAVIOR AT HIGHWAY-RAIL INTERSECTIONS
• DRIVER-HEADLAMP DIMENSIONS, DRIVER CHARACTERISTICS, AND VEHICLE AND ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS IN RETROREFLECTIVE TARGET VISIBILITY CALCULATIONS
• EVALUATION OF TWO NEW CROSSBUCK DESIGNS FOR PASSIVE HIGHWAY-RAILROAD GRADE CROSSINGS
• EVALUATION OF UNASSIGNED SIGN COLORS FOR INCIDENT MANAGEMENT TRAILBLAZING
• INFLUENCE OF PAVEMENT SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS ON NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY OF OBJECTS
• LEGIBILITY OF TRAFFIC SIGN TEXT AND SYMBOLS
• PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF THREE FREEWAY GUIDE SIGN ALPHABETS
• RECOGNITION DISTANCES OF DIFFERENT PAVEMENT ARROW DESIGNS DURING DAYTIME AND NIGHTTIME
• STUDY OF EFFECTIVENESS OF SELECTED SCHOOL ZONE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES
• SUPERVISED INTERCONNECTION CIRCUITS AT HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS
• VIOLATIONS AT GATED HIGHWAY-RAILROAD GRADE CROSSINGS
• VISUAL TARGET DETECTION MODELS FOR CIVIL TWILIGHT AND NIGHT DRIVING CONDITIONS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE)