00743707

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1604-14

http://scholar.google.com...cock&publication_year=1997

In the past, transit had a monopoly over service to large segments of society: one-car families or those who could not afford to drive. Now transit competes with the automobile for most consumers' travel. To increase trip making and attract new customers in a competitive market, transit agencies must refocus from an internally driven orientation aligned with providing public service to an externally driven orientation aligned with the mission of delivering products and service that meet consumer expectations and requirements. Descriptive results of research to identify customer requirements for design and delivery of high-quality transit service are reported. Nearly 500 customers and potential customers of King County Metro Transit in Seattle, Washington, completed questionnaires designed to identify important elements and their performance requirements for each. The questionnaire was developed with intensive customer input to ensure that wording reflected customer and not staff perceptions. Requirements for service design included the following: 15-min headways for work and personal travel; no transferring to work; and total travel time to work no more than 50% longer than by car. Customer requirements for service delivery among elements that customers considered important included the following: the bus never leaves the stop early; seats are clean and dry; arrival time to work is no more than 5 min late; and windows are in good repair. Nonriders who were potential customers rated the service design element of transferring comparable with automobile travel time as more important than did riders. Riders were more likely than nonriders to require 15-min headways for work travel.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1604, Public Transit 1997: Planning, Management, Marketing, and New Technology.

English

p. 121-127

1997

Transportation Research Record

0309062071

Figures (9) ; References (4) ; Tables (5)

Customer service; Data collection; Delivery service; Public transit; Questionnaires; Specifications; Surveys

King County Metro Transit

Requirements; Service delivery; Service design; Transit services

Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 23 1997 12:00AM

• ACCESSIBLE LOW-FLOOR BUS: SYSTEM APPROACH IN FRANCE
• DEVELOPING A PERFORMANCE-BASED TRANSIT ALLOCATION FORMULA: CASE STUDY FOR A PARTICIPATORY PROCESS
• FEASIBILITY OF ADVANCED VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR TRANSIT BUSES
• HAVE WE LOST THE MESSAGE BEFORE GAINING THE KNOWLEDGE?
• IDENTIFYING NEW MARKETS FOR RAIL TRANSIT: CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR
• INDIANA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• INFLUENCE OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ON POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT LOCATION
• INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR REVENUE CAPTURE AND CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR TRANSIT
• INTEGRATED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR EVALUATING TRANSIT AND LAND-USE COORDINATION POLICIES
• MOBILITY ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS
• PARKING SUPPLY POLICY AND TRANSIT USE: CASE STUDY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
• PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT: MODEL OF WALK TRIPS AND THEIR DESIGN AND URBAN FORM DETERMINANTS AROUND BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS
• PUBLIC TRANSPORT PRICING POLICY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF REGIONAL BUS CARD SYSTEMS IN FINLAND
• SYSTEMS PLANNING FOR CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY OF NEW JERSEY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• TRANSIT FRIENDLINESS FACTOR: APPROACH TO QUANTIFYING TRANSIT ACCESS ENVIRONMENT IN A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL
• TRANSIT INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR TRANSIT-DEPENDENT RIDERS
• TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN AND OPERATION PRACTICES IN WESTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
• UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES IN PUBLIC TRANSIT: COMPARISON OF BOSTON AND TORONTO
• USE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS