00743703

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/1604-10

http://scholar.google.com...erly&publication_year=1997

The state of Indiana provides operating assistance to transit operators throughout the state. The original formula was designed to reward performance but over time became inflexible to changing situations. The Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) initiated a study to "create a rational and equitable mechanism for the distribution of State operating assistance to urban and rural transit providers throughout Indiana." This objective was accomplished through an extensive process that involved the affected transit systems, including a survey of all systems and five meetings with transit system representatives. Transit system preferences were a major deciding factor in selecting specific performance measures and in consideration of factors of importance to the affected systems. The final recommendation was developed under the direction of INDOT and is under senior government review. The recommendation provides a funding mechanism that is flexible, provides comparisons within peer groups and rewards the transit systems within each group that are best serving their customers and providing cost-effective service to their communities, and provides incentives and a phase-in period to encourage systems to improve. The process of developing the formula and its potential application to other states are described.

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1604, Public Transit 1997: Planning, Management, Marketing, and New Technology.

English

p. 83-91

1997

Transportation Research Record

0309062071

Figures (1) ; References (4) ; Tables (2)

Case studies; Flexibility; Formulas; Improvements; Incentives; Level of service; Operating subsidies; Transit operators

Fund allocations; Rewards

Indiana

Finance; Highways; Public Transportation

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 22 1997 12:00AM

• ACCESSIBLE LOW-FLOOR BUS: SYSTEM APPROACH IN FRANCE
• FEASIBILITY OF ADVANCED VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR TRANSIT BUSES
• HAVE WE LOST THE MESSAGE BEFORE GAINING THE KNOWLEDGE?
• IDENTIFYING NEW MARKETS FOR RAIL TRANSIT: CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY'S SOUTHWEST CORRIDOR
• INDIANA PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• INFLUENCE OF THE METROPOLITAN ATLANTA RAPID TRANSIT AUTHORITY ON POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT LOCATION
• INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR REVENUE CAPTURE AND CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT FOR TRANSIT
• INTEGRATED DECISION SUPPORT TOOL FOR EVALUATING TRANSIT AND LAND-USE COORDINATION POLICIES
• MOBILITY ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT SYSTEMS
• PARKING SUPPLY POLICY AND TRANSIT USE: CASE STUDY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA
• PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO TRANSIT: MODEL OF WALK TRIPS AND THEIR DESIGN AND URBAN FORM DETERMINANTS AROUND BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT STATIONS
• PUBLIC TRANSPORT PRICING POLICY: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE OF REGIONAL BUS CARD SYSTEMS IN FINLAND
• RESEARCH ON CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS FOR TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN AND DELIVERY
• SYSTEMS PLANNING FOR CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT: CASE STUDY OF NEW JERSEY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
• TRANSIT FRIENDLINESS FACTOR: APPROACH TO QUANTIFYING TRANSIT ACCESS ENVIRONMENT IN A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING MODEL
• TRANSIT INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR TRANSIT-DEPENDENT RIDERS
• TRANSIT SERVICE DESIGN AND OPERATION PRACTICES IN WESTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
• UNDERSTANDING DIFFERENCES IN PUBLIC TRANSIT: COMPARISON OF BOSTON AND TORONTO
• USE OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ANALYSIS OF TRANSIT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS