TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

SMASH (SIMULATION MODEL OF ACTIVITY SCHEDULING HEURISTICS): SOME SIMULATIONS

Accession Number:

00732302

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/0309059216

Abstract:

Travel decision making is increasingly regarded as a highly complex process in which individuals not only decide about frequency of trips, travel modes, and routes, but also about activity participation and sequencing and timing and duration of activities and trips. This raises the question of whether or not traditional discrete-choice models still provide the best starting point for realistically modeling such a process. Some scholars consider computational process models (CPMs) a promising approach because they allow for heuristic search and suboptimal reasoning processes, which are typical for complex decision making. A model of activity scheduling, SMASH (Simulation Model of Activity Scheduling Heuristics), which incorporates aspects of discrete-choice modeling and CPMs, has been proposed. The model describes the pretrip planning phase, in which individuals decide which activities to perform, at what locations, at what times, in which sequence, and how to travel to the various activity sites. The calibration of this model, using data collected with the interactive computerized procedure MAGIC, has been described in the literature. The results indicated that when scheduling their activities, subjects seem to trade off attributes of activities (time constraints, duration), attributes of the schedule (time spent on activities, overall travel time, realism) and characteristics of the scheduling process (amount of effort already involved in the scheduling process) to obtain feasible schedules. More extensive tests, using simulation experiments, of the model's internal, predictive, and face validity are described. SMASH was used to predict subjects' activity schedules based on their activity agenda and information about their spatio-temporal circumstances. The predicted schedules were then compared with the activity schedules conceived by the subjects themselves under different circumstances, to assess the model's validity. The tests indicated that the model provided satisfactory results with respect to the reproduction of the observed activity schedules. The results of the validity test warrant the use of the model for assessing the effects of various policy measures such as time policies, land use policies, and travel demand management.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper appears in Transportation Research Record No. 1551, Innovative Transportation Data Management, Survey Methods, and Geographic Information Systems.

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Ettema, D
Borgers, A
Timmermans, H

Pagination:

p. 88-94

Publication Date:

1996

Serial:

Transportation Research Record

Issue Number: 1551
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

0309059216

Features:

References (23) ; Tables (5)

Old TRIS Terms:

Subject Areas:

Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Feb 6 1997 12:00AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: