00450904

Component

http://onlinepubs.trb.org...s/trr/1984/991/991-002.pdf

https://scholar.google.co...dson&publication_year=1984

In connection with updating its areawide transportation system plan, the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) effectively combined public seminar/workshops with a random-digit-dialing telephone survey. The two techniques were combined to gather data on publicly perceived transportation system problems and to achieve an additional measurement for triangulation. Similarities and differences between the two techniques and resulting data sets are explored. The authors advocate combining traditionally accepted public meetings with surveys to achieve both research and public involvement goals.

Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Publication of this paper sponsored by Committee on Citizen Participation in Transportation Planning.

01419876

pp 9-14

1984

Transportation Research Record

0309038006

Print

References (19) ; Tables (4)

Data collection; Highway maintenance; Metropolitan planning organizations; Public participation; Public transit; Randomization; Road construction; Strategic planning; Surveys; Telephone; Transportation planning; Transportation system management

Ohio

Data and Information Technology; Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; Society; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB

Feb 28 1986 12:00AM

• AUTOMOBILE RESTRICTED ZONES IN DOWNTOWNS: LESSONS FROM UMTA'S DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
• CURRENT USE OF PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT TECHNIQUES BY STATE HIGHWAY AGENCIES
• SOCIOECONOMIC REACTIONS TO HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT
• STATUS AND PROSPECTS OF THE AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT INDUSTRY IN THE UNITED STATES
• THE AUTOMATIC GUIDEWAY TRANSIT EXPERIENCE IN CLEVELAND, HOUSTON, LOS ANGELES, AND ST. PAUL
• THE EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS: THREE CASE STUDIES IN PENNSYLVANIA
• THE OPEN FORMAT AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING