01622784

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2630-18

Transportation agencies have significantly improved many aspects of project delivery, yet they continue to be challenged by cost increases and time delays that occur after a project is programmed and funded. An increase or a change in the scope of a project to improve facility performance is a common source of such cost increases and schedule delays. Therefore, this study focused on improvement in the project scoping process (PSP) to achieve on-time and on-budget delivery of highway projects. The thrust of this research was to develop a framework that could help transportation agencies improve their scope development processes and practices. A key effort in this study was to assess current project scoping practices. After a literature review, the research team developed a survey protocol, distributed questionnaires, collected survey data, and performed data analysis. Forty responses were received that represented 23 state transportation agencies (STAs). On the basis of the survey responses, six STAs were selected for face-to-face interviews. The intent of the interviews was to confirm survey results and delve into topics not covered in the survey. As a result of these tasks, the research team identified considerable variation in scope development processes across the agencies with respect to the definition of a PSP, formality of the process, timing of the PSP, and project maturity when a project is programmed. On the basis of what was learned from the literature review, surveys, and follow-up interviews, the research team developed a PSP definition and framework. This PSP framework contains three major actions, namely, to select the project, to analyze the project, and to advance the preferred alternative.

01634656

17-06062

English

pp 147–155

2017

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309441841

Digital/other

Figures (6) ; References (12) ; Tables (2)

Best practices; Construction projects; Highways; Literature reviews; Project delivery; State departments of transportation; Surveys

Construction; Highways

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 8 2016 12:27PM

• Assessment of State Agencies’ Practices in Managing Geotechnical Risk in Design–Build Projects
• Comparison of Qualifications-Based Selection and Best-Value Procurement for Construction Manager–General Contractor Highway Construction
• Density Observations from a Full-Scale, Untrafficked Test Section with Guidance for Dryback Methods
• Economic Impact Analysis of Bridge Construction
• Estimating Earthwork Volumes Through Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems
• Evaluation of Stainless Steel Fasteners for Bolted Field Splice Connections of ASTM A1010 Corrosion-Resistant Steel Plate Girders
• Exploration of Early Work Packaging in Construction Manager–General Contractor Highway Projects
• Factors Related to the Appearance of Transverse Bumps in Asphalt Overlays Placed over Crack Sealant
• Field and Laboratory Properties of Roller-Compacted Concrete Pavements
• Framework for Objectively Determining Best Practices for Alternative Contracting Methods
• Highly Modified Asphalt Binder for Asphalt Crack Relief Mix
• Impact of Alternative Project Delivery Systems on the International Roughness Index: Case Studies of Transportation Projects in the Western United States
• Impact of High Asphalt Binder Replacement on Level Binder Properties for Controlling Reflective Cracking
• Monitoring During Lateral Bridge Slide
• New Quality Assurance Tests for Building Quality Concrete Pavement
• Roles and Responsibilities of Independent Cost Estimator in Construction Manager–General Contractor Highway Construction
• Wisconsin Department of Transportation Hot-Mix Asphalt Round Robin Laboratory Qualification Testing Program