01594802

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2597-08

Speed management has been a long-standing concern of transportation agencies. Recently, nationwide speed limit policy modifications have resulted in a general upward trend in many states. In Michigan, legislation was proposed to raise the maximum speed limits on state-owned, rural, nonfreeway highways from 55 to 65 mph. In response to this proposed speed limit policy change, research was performed to assess the associated economic impacts through the use of benefit–cost analysis. Several potential implementation scenarios of the proposed speed limit policy were investigated; these included a limited subset of roadways with favorable geometry and full statewide implementation. A primary research task was to estimate the costs for infrastructure upgrades necessary to achieve compliance with state and federal design speed requirements for the cohort of roadways included within each 65 mph implementation scenario. User benefits and disbenefits associated with the proposed speed limit increase also were estimated, which included reduced travel times, increased fuel consumption, and increased traffic crashes. Although the travel time savings were estimated to exceed the fuel consumption costs, the resulting benefit was far outweighed by crash-related disbenefits and agency infrastructure costs for roadways that required major geometric modifications (e.g., vertical or horizontal realignment). Consequently, an increase in the speed limit to 65 mph on rural, nonfreeway highways should be considered only if the critical geometric elements can maintain design speed compliance without major modification. However, even for roadways on which design speed compliance is maintained, careful, site-specific consideration must be given to the potential safety impacts, particularly with respect to fatal and injury crashes, which may result after the speed limit is increased.

01587307

16-6188

English

pp 60–66

2016

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309370028

Print

References (30) ; Tables (6)

Benefit cost analysis; Fuel consumption; Geometric segments; Infrastructure; Rural areas; Speed limits; Travel time

Michigan

Economics; Finance; Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Safety and Human Factors

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 12 2016 6:44PM

• Activity-Based Computation of Marginal Noise Exposure Costs: Implications for Traffic Management
• Crowd Financing for Public–Private Partnerships in the United States: How Would It Work?
• Development of a Fuel Consumption and Mileage Allocation Model to Support Mileage-Based User Fee Research in Washington State
• Economic Analysis of Freeway Speed Limit Policy Alternatives
• Governance of Public–Private Partnerships and Infrastructure Delivery: Case of the Milan, Italy, Metro Line M4
• Illustration of a Framework for Benefit–Cost Evaluation of Highway Concession Proposals
• Impact of New Tolls on Existing Roadway Facilities: Hampton Roads, Virginia, Experience
• Importance of Recognizing Locational Differences in Assessing the Impact of a Road User Charge: Oregon Case Study
• Integrating Automated Toll Discounts into a Real-Time Ridesharing Program
• Integrating Multiple Economic Analysis Methods for More Effective Decision Making: Three-Dimensional Framework
• Market Penetration Model for Autonomous Vehicles on the Basis of Earlier Technology Adoption Experience
• Price Elasticity of Demand on the High-Speed Rail Lines of Spain: Impact of the New Pricing Scheme
• Renewing Trucking’s Infrastructure for the 21st Century
• Updating State and Local Highway Cost Allocation and Revenue Attribution: A Case Study for Indiana
• Value of Travel Time: To Differentiate or Not to Differentiate?