01587812

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2593-02

Interest in counting bicycles and establishing nonmotorized counting programs is increasing, but jurisdictions still struggle with how to integrate bicycle counting into standard practice. In this paper, the authors share findings and recommendations for how to minimize error for bicycle counting from tests conducted in conjunction with the Oregon Department of Transportation. This research studied three types of off-the-shelf pneumatic tube counters for counting bicycles, including equipment from five manufacturers: two bicycle-specific counters, three varieties of motor vehicle classification counters, and one volume-only motor vehicle counter. Tests were conducted both in a controlled environment and in on-road mixed traffic to better identify problems in accuracy. Equipment studied generally undercounted cyclists, especially those in groups. Results from the controlled test with standard bicycles showed that within 10 ft of the counter, the undercounting error ranged from 0% to –12%. In the mixed-traffic test, all the equipment tested tended to undercount with mean percent error ranging from –10% to –73%. Each counter type has pros and cons, but in general, counting accuracy decreased with increases in bicycle and motor vehicle traffic and longer tube lengths. Higher accuracy can be achieved by careful selection of equipment type, classification scheme, and tube configuration. Bicycle speeds given by off-the-shelf pneumatic counting equipment were accurate.

01594375

16-2118

English

pp 8–17

2016

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369732

Print

Figures (4) ; Photos; References (11) ; Tables (4)

Accuracy; Bicycles; Nonmotorized transportation; Pneumatic equipment; Traffic counts; Tubing

Oregon Department of Transportation

Oregon

Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Vehicles and Equipment

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 12 2016 4:56PM

• Battery-Saving Communication Modes for Wireless Freeway Traffic Sensors
• Data-Cleaning Technique for Reliable Real-Life Travel Time Estimation: Use of Dedicated Short-Range Communications Probes on Rural Highways
• Estimating Daily Bicycle Counts in Seattle, Washington, from Seasonal and Weather Factors
• Identifying Factors to Improve Transportation Asset Management Program Sustainment: Applying Implementation Research and Change Management Principles
• Improved Annual Average Daily Traffic Estimation Processes
• Integrating Intersection Traffic Signal Data into a Traffic Monitoring Program
• Monitoring and Modeling of Urban Trail Traffic: Validation of Direct Demand Models in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Columbus, Ohio
• Online Method to Impute Missing Loop Detector Data for Urban Freeway Traffic Control
• Quality Assurance for Traffic Count Data in National Parks: Ensuring Quality When Traffic Variability Is High
• Recommended Procedure to Adjust Inaccurate Weigh-in-Motion Data
• Toward a Better Estimation of Annual Average Daily Bicycle Traffic: Comparison of Methods for Calculating Daily Adjustment Factors