01555122

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2520-08

Bicycling has been increasing in North America, and intersections have been modified to accommodate the increase in cyclists. However, the increase in cycling is outpacing the supply of high-quality cycling markings, signing, signals, and general infrastructure at intersections. For example, recent research indicates that more than 50% of bicyclists do not understand that the 9C-7 bicycle stencil symbol from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) indicates the optimal waiting position for a cyclist to call a green light. Subsequently, people on bicycles may run red lights because they do not understand how the MUTCD 9C-7 pavement marking works. This infrastructure shortcoming illustrates the need to study how new roadway information may affect user behavior and traffic signal compliance. This research documents the effects of an active feedback device on cyclist behavior in an effort to improve the cycling experience. A blue light feedback device was installed at a signalized intersection approach, and its impact on bicyclist behavior was studied. A statistically significant increase in the number of bicyclists who used the MUTCD 9C-7 marking (instead of the existing bicycle push button) occurred after installation of the blue light feedback device and especially after a sandwich board sign was installed that described the purpose of the blue light. These results indicate that a blue light feedback device (accompanied with bicycle detection and the standard marking) could be used effectively in lieu of bicycle push buttons. Also, the effect of the blue light feedback device on bicyclist compliance with traffic signals (red light runners) was negligible.

01596001

15-3409

English

pp 61–66

2015

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369589

Print

Figures (5) ; Photos; References (15) ; Tables (2)

Behavior; Cyclists; Detectors; Feedback control; Infrastructure; Red light running; Road markings; Signalized intersections

Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting; Safety and Human Factors; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning; I73: Traffic Control

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 30 2014 1:08PM

• Business and Bikeshare User Perceptions of the Economic Benefits of Capital Bikeshare
• Can Time Proximity Measures Be Used as Safety Indicators in All Driving Cultures? Case Study of Motorcycle Safety in China
• Design Guidance for Bicycle Lane Widths
• Dynamic Ventilation and Power Output of Urban Bicyclists
• Electric Bicycle Use and Mode Choice in the Netherlands
• Evaluation of the Passing Behavior of Motorized Vehicles When Overtaking Bicycles on Urban Arterial Roadways
• Exploratory Analysis of Motorcycle Incidents Using Naturalistic Riding Data
• Factors Affecting Drivers’ Ability to Detect Motorcycles During Daylight in a Simulated Environment
• Influence of Bike Lane Buffer Types on Perceived Comfort and Safety of Bicyclists and Potential Bicyclists
• Level-of-Service Model for Protected Bike Lanes
• Measuring the Use of Motorcycle Helmets: Observational Survey of Motorcyclists in Florida
• Modeling the Impact of Pavement Roughness on Bicycle Ride Quality
• Neighborhood Characteristics That Support Bicycle Commuting: Analysis of the Top 100 U.S. Census Tracts
• Rumble Strip Gaps for High-Speed Bicycles
• Some Operational Features in Bicycle Traffic Flow: Observational Study
• User Behavior and Perceptions at Intersections with Turning and Mixing Zones on Protected Bike Lanes
• Using Bicycle Level of Service for Decision Making: Comparison of Common Bicycle Level-of-Service Measures, Roadway Characteristics, and Perceived Bike Route Suitability
• When Do Drivers Yield to Cyclists at Unsignalized Roundabouts? Empirical Evidence and Behavioral Analysis