01556273

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2499-07

In the light of social and political currents calling for increased accountability for public processes and discussions between federal officials about the performance of the public involvement process, this paper examines public involvement in transportation and develops frameworks for identifying suitable approaches and evaluating outcomes. The aims of this paper are to (a) foster analytic, evidence-driven discussion between public involvement professionals, project managers, consultants, and other members of the transportation community about process quality metrics and (b) propose strategies for increasing performance of such processes by developing multidimensional process evaluation frameworks for public involvement design and outcomes. A significant Arnstein gap is identified in the quality of public involvement in transportation. A critical overview of current practice that draws on the literature on public involvement and participation is presented. Using a soft systems approach, the authors frame participation methods in distributive domain and define outcome performance criteria. The authors examine the literature on process performance in environmental management and other participation research and propose four process performance metrics for public involvement: quality, inclusion, clarity, and efficiency. Objective data from projects in structured public involvement are presented. These data illustrate that processes that satisfy these metrics will help to close the Arnstein gap by identifying stronger methodologies for involving large groups of citizens with diverse values, delivering objectively high stakeholder-evaluated process quality, and integrating these valuations into effective decision support systems for project managers and engineers. However, this improvement will require a philosophical shift to a higher level on the Arnstein ladder.

01582887

15-2408

English

pp 45–53

2015

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309369275

Print

Figures (3) ; References (81) ; Tables (2)

Infrastructure; Performance measurement; Planning and design; Public participation; State of the practice; Strategic planning; Transportation

Process improvement

Planning and Forecasting; Transportation (General); I20: Design and Planning of Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Dec 30 2014 12:51PM

• Accessibility and Potential Mobility as a Guide for Policy Action
• Integrated Fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution Framework for Evaluating High-Speed Passenger Rail Corridor Alternatives
• Network Robustness Index Application at Pikes Peak Area Council of Governments, Colorado Springs, Colorado
• Using Mobile Phone Location Data to Develop External Trip Models
• White Bikes of De Hoge Veluwe National Park, Netherlands: Case Study for Consideration by U.S. Federal Land Managers
• Zion National Park, Utah: Enhancing Visitor Experience Through Improved Transportation