01515297

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2464-03

Because urban areas house 80% of the population and account for almost two-thirds of all pedestrian fatalities, making safe accommodation of pedestrians is a key priority in those locations. Crosswalks at T-intersections are a prime example of an intersection geometry in such areas that is challenging for drivers and pedestrians alike. Previous research has validated the advantages of advance yield markings over other, more common, unsignalized, midblock crosswalk treatments. Such markings could also prove effective at unsignalized T-intersection crosswalks, especially in multiple-threat situations where the driver’s view of critical information is obscured by other yielding vehicles. For this study, a simulator was used to compare the effectiveness of advanced yield markings and standard crosswalk markings on drivers’ behaviors at unsignalized T-intersections. Measures of scanning behaviors were gathered with an eye tracker, and measures of stopping or yielding behaviors were gathered from simulator data. Crosswalks in the simulated world were located on the near and the far sides of the side street (from the participant driver’s perspective). A vehicle obstructing the driver’s view of pedestrians in the crosswalk was placed in either the left travel lane or the right travel lane. There was a main effect of the treatment (advance yield markings were more safe) and the location of the crosswalk (the far side was more safe). There was an interaction between the treatment and the location of the obstruction (advance yield markings had an effect on glances only when the obstructing vehicle was in the left travel lane). The findings from the study have clear implications for practice.

01557586

14-1834

English

pp 20–28

2014

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309295567

Print

Figures (5) ; References (14) ; Tables (2)

Driver performance; Multiway stop signs; Pedestrian safety; Pedestrian vehicle crashes; Road markings; Simulation; T intersections; Traffic conflicts

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor; I85: Safety Devices used in Transport Infrastructure

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2014 2:40PM

• Assessing the Safety Benefit of Advanced Vehicular Technology for Protecting Pedestrians: Pedestrian Protection Airbags
• Closed-Course Study of Driver Detection of Pedestrians Beyond Flashing Beacons Within Sign Assembly
• Development of Low-Cost Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian Safety in Support of Complete Streets Policy Implementation
• Driver Approach Speed and Its Impact on Driver Yielding to Pedestrian Behavior at Unsignalized Crosswalks
• Evaluating Driver and Pedestrian Behaviors at Enhanced, Multilane, Midblock Pedestrian Crossings: Case Study in Portland, Oregon
• Examining Long-Term Impact of California Safe Routes to School Program: Ten Years Later
• Far-Side Audible Beaconing of Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Is It Confusing?
• Impact of Intersection Design on Pedestrians’ Choice to Cross on Red
• Impacts of Alternative Yield Sign Placement on Pedestrian Safety
• Pedestrian Safety Initiative in Montgomery County, Maryland: Data-Driven Approach to Coordinating Engineering, Education, and Enforcement
• Perception-Based Walkability Index to Test Impact of Microlevel Walkability on Sustainable Mode Choice Decisions
• Planning-Level Model for Assessing Pedestrian Safety
• Safety Performance Study of Shared Pedestrian and Vehicle Space in New Zealand
• Understanding Pedestrian and Bicyclist Compliance and Safety Impacts of Walk Modes at Signalized Intersections for a Livable Community
• Walkability Indicators for Pedestrian-Friendly Design
• Walking Behaviors by Trip Purposes
• Walking for Purpose and Pleasure: Influences of Light Rail, Built Environment, and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Travel