|
Title: Reconciliation of Regional Travel Model and Passive Device Tracking Data
Accession Number: 01516079
Record Type: Component
Availability: Transportation Research Board Business Office 500 Fifth Street, NW Abstract: The ability to passively track large numbers of mobile devices has generated a lot of excitement in recent years. Traditional travel surveys without Global Positioning Satellite (GPS) tracking, either wholly or in part, seems passé today. However, GPS tracking can only overcome some of the problems associated with travel diary surveys. It can capture missed trips and route choice information, but at increased cost per survey. However, it does nothing to ease the rising cost and difficulty associated with contacting, recruiting, retaining households in the first place, or collecting and processing the data. Passive tracking overcomes these limitations, at the expense of giving up interaction with the device owner. Thus, information about the traveler, trip purpose, and other details must be inferred or lost. The ideal solution is to use both travel diaries and passive tracking together. While techniques for fusing these data are yet to be proven the concept has strong intuitive appeal. Until such techniques emerge the question becomes whether such data can be used on their own, and whether they resemble the output of travel models built using traditional survey data. The opportunity to answer such questions arose recently in the Research Triangle Region of North Carolina, which served as a pilot project for using origin destination data from AirSage as an adjunct to modeling. A detailed analysis of the differences between the AirSage data and the Triangle Regional Model (TRM) has been completed. The differences were subtle in some cases and surprising in others. This paper reports on the findings of this comparison. A brief description of the AirSage data and TRM provides the context for the discussion. Presented in this paper is the methodology for comparing the two data sources along with the results. The results show that the highway assignment using AirSage data is comparable to the highway assignment using model estimated trip tables, supporting the use of passively collected cellular data as a low cost option for travel model validation.
Supplemental Notes: This paper was sponsored by TRB committee ADB50 Transportation Planning Applications.
Monograph Title: Monograph Accession #: 01503729
Report/Paper Numbers: 14-1058
Language: English
Corporate Authors: Transportation Research Board 500 Fifth Street, NW Authors: Huntsinger, Leta FDonnelly, RickPagination: 12p
Publication Date: 2014
Conference:
Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting
Location:
Washington DC Media Type: Digital/other
Features: Figures; Maps; References; Tables
TRT Terms: Geographic Terms: Subject Areas: Data and Information Technology; Highways; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning
Source Data: Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2014 Paper #14-1058
Files: PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI
Created Date: Jan 27 2014 2:25PM
|