01520327

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2468-15

On April 13, 2012, Michigan instituted reforms to its long-standing universal helmet law (UHL) and thus became the 28th state with a partial helmet law, which requires helmet use by only a subset of the riding population. Given continuing increases in motorcycle fatalities, helmet use remains a divisive policy issue facing state governments. The existing research literature includes several before-and-after studies that evaluate the effects of changes in motorcycle helmet laws on metrics such as helmet use and statewide motorcycle fatalities. However, a comprehensive assessment of the effects of helmet use laws on the full range of crash injury outcomes is lacking. Important evidence was added to inform the continuing debate about the efficacy of UHLs. A detailed, disaggregate-level study was conducted to assess the degree of injury severity sustained by motorcyclists involved in crashes before and after Michigan’s transition from a UHL to a partial helmet law. By controlling for various rider, roadway, traffic, and weather characteristics, results of the study demonstrate that helmets reduced the probability of fatalities by more than 50%. Injuries tended to be less severe in crashes that involved deer, occurred at lower speeds, or occurred in inclement weather but more severe in high-speed collisions or when drugs and alcohol were involved. The riders who tended to be more susceptible to severe injury were female, younger (age 21 to 30 years), or older (age 51 to 70 years).

01557587

14-0045

English

pp 131–137

2014

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309295659

Print

Figures (1) ; Maps; References (41) ; Tables (3)

Age groups; Crash characteristics; Crash data; Crash injuries; Drunk driving; Fatalities; Gender; Highway safety; Injury severity; Laws and legislation; Motorcycle helmets; Speed

Michigan

Highways; Law; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I81: Accident Statistics; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Jan 27 2014 2:08PM

• Bicyclists as Consumers: Mode Choice and Spending Behavior in Downtown Davis, California
• Characterizing Usage Patterns for Powered Two-Wheelers from Automatic Vehicle Identification Data in Melbourne, Australia
• Computer Vision Techniques to Collect Helmet-Wearing Data on Cyclists
• Cost–Benefit Analysis of Added Cycling Facilities
• Day-of-Year Scaling Factors and Design Considerations for Nonmotorized Traffic Monitoring Programs
• Dispersion Effect in Left-Turning Bicycle Traffic and Its Influence on Capacity of Left-Turning Vehicles at Signalized Intersections
• Electric Bikes in North America: Results of an Online Survey
• Evaluation of Interactions Between Buses and Bicycles at Stops
• Identifying the Leaders: Applying Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Use of a Public Bikeshare System in Vancouver, Canada
• Incorporating Weather: Comparative Analysis of Annual Average Daily Bicyclist Traffic Estimation Methods
• Measuring Traffic Reduction from Bicycle Commuting
• Modeling the Impacts of Bicycle Facilities on Work and Recreational Bike Trips in Los Angeles County, California
• Multimodal Commuting to Work by Public Transport and Bicycle: Attitudes Toward Mode Choice
• Red Light Running Behavior of Electric Bicycles at Signalized Intersections in China
• StreetSeen Visual Survey Tool for Determining Factors That Make a Street Attractive for Bicycling