01474082

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-14

http://scholar.google.com...mith&publication_year=2013

The integration of electric bicycles (e-bikes) with bikesharing could increase the utility of bikesharing through a reduction of some barriers to bicycling and an increase in the number of prospective users. North America’s first e-bikesharing system (cycleUshare) at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, offers a new, sustainable transportation option for students, faculty, and staff. The cycleUshare system with two stations was launched as a small pilot project to study the technology and its users’ experiences. This paper presents an overview of the cycleUshare system and reports experiences from the first year of operation. With 93 enrolled users, cycleUshare provided a unique opportunity to study not only the system’s use but how individual users made trips with both regular bicycles and e-bikes and the factors that influenced those trips. The study reported here found that only 22% of users accounted for 81% of the trips. Factors of speed and convenience played major roles in participants’ decisions to use the system, and speed and comfort were the most influential factors in the selection of an e-bike rather than a regular bicycle. Most of the reported trips were class related, although e-bikes were used for a wide variety of trip purposes. Walking was the mode most displaced by the system; this result indicated that e-bikesharing expanded user mobility. User perceptions about bicycle types were explored also. This model of e-bikeshare was effective in its capability to attract users to both regular bicycles and e-bikes and to expand user mobility.

01514640

13-5107

English

pp 120–128

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309287067

Print

Figures (3) ; References (19) ; Tables (4)

Bicycles; Bicycling; Case studies; Pilot studies; Trip purpose; Two wheeled vehicles; Universities and colleges; Vehicle sharing

University of Tennessee

Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting; Vehicles and Equipment; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:58PM

• Are Bikeshare Users Different from Regular Cyclists? A First Look at Short-Term Users, Annual Members, and Area Cyclists in the Washington, D.C., Region
• Assessment of Three Alternative Bicycle Infrastructure Quality-of-Service Metrics
• Bicycle-Specific Traffic Signals: Results from a State-of-the-Practice Review
• Built Environment and Household Electric Bike Ownership: Insights from Zhongshan Metropolitan Area, China
• Characteristics of Multimodal Conflicts in Urban On-Street Bicycle Lanes
• Commuter Cyclist Travel Behavior: Examination of the Impact of Changes in Weather
• Computer Vision Techniques for the Automated Collection of Cyclist Data
• Development of Surface Roughness Standards for Pathways Used by Wheelchairs
• Evaluation of Innovative Bicycle Facilities in Washington, D.C.: Pennsylvania Avenue Median Lanes and 15th Street Cycle Track
• Four Types of Cyclists? Examination of Typology for Better Understanding of Bicycling Behavior and Potential
• Is Evidence in Practice? Review of Driver and Cyclist Education Materials with Respect to Cycling Safety Evidence
• Methodology for Estimating Bicyclist Acceleration and Speed Distributions at Intersections
• Modeling of Passing Events in Mixed Bicycle Traffic with Cellular Automata
• Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator Understanding and Emerging Trends
• Role of the Bicycle in the Limitation of Transport Poverty in the Netherlands
• Station-Level Forecasting of Bikesharing Ridership: Station Network Effects in Three U.S. Systems