TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Does Transit Mean Business? Reconciling Academic, Organizational, and Political Perspectives on Variable Transit Fares
Cover of Does Transit Mean Business? Reconciling Academic, Organizational, and Political Perspectives on Variable Transit Fares

Accession Number:

01479186

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Abstract:

For decades transportation scholars have argued in favor of differentiated transit fares, which vary by mode, distance, and/or time-of-day. Such fare policies, researchers contend, could greatly increase the efficiency, efficacy, and equity of transit service. However, despite this established research on the benefits of differentiated fares, relatively few transit agencies employ them, and over the past two decades many have actually eliminated differential fares and replaced them with flat fares. Advances in smartcard fare collection technology have reduced the operational obstacles to charging differentiated fares, but with the proliferation of this technology, will transit systems begin implementing differentiated fares? The authors find that changes in fare policies are often crisis-induced and budget-driven, and this ad hoc process reflects the multitude of (and sometimes contradictory) goals that transit agencies pursue – including the political need to provide affordable alternatives to automobiles. This suggests that new smartcard technology may be necessary to overcome operational challenges, but not sufficient to overcome political challenges. The authors also find a significant gap between current practices (of charging flat fares) and beliefs among transit agency officials that more flexible pricing should be implemented. Heard many times over in interviews was deep concern about losing any riders as a result of introducing differentiated fares – despite possible gains in other rider groups or trips made on transit. This fear of losing riders to automobiles, coupled with officials’ reported desires to implement variable fares, suggests that transit agencies should support the adoption of congestion and parking pricing programs, which internalize the costs of driving. Doing so would remove a fundamental barrier to implementing variable transit fares.

Supplemental Notes:

This paper was sponsored by TRB committee AP030 Public Transportation Marketing and Fare Policy.

Monograph Accession #:

01470560

Report/Paper Numbers:

13-4980

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Yoh, Allison C
Taylor, Brian D
Gahbauer, John

Pagination:

16p

Publication Date:

2013

Conference:

Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting

Location: Washington DC, United States
Date: 2013-1-13 to 2013-1-17
Sponsors: Transportation Research Board

Media Type:

Digital/other

Features:

Figures; References; Tables

Subject Areas:

Finance; Policy; Public Transportation; I10: Economics and Administration

Source Data:

Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2013 Paper #13-4980

Files:

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Feb 5 2013 12:57PM