01474145

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2346-06

http://scholar.google.com...athy&publication_year=2013

Despite data that estimate the amount of fuel tax evasion, few papers have examined fuel tax evasion through the fuel tax refund process. This paper presents data analysis indicating that the fuel tax refund process, though susceptible to errors, is not a common means of evasion. Motor fuel taxes are excise taxes meant to benefit transportation infrastructure. However, some fuel use occurs off the roadway. For example, a farm tractor expends fuel while plowing a field; well-drilling trucks expend fuel while drilling a well; and truck refrigeration units with separate fuel tanks expend fuel powering the refrigerator pump. Arguably, users should not have to pay an excise tax for fuel used for off-road purposes. For diesel, at least, the federal government created tax-exempt, dyed diesel. However, some users are not able to purchase dyed diesel, or they require another type of fuel. The federal government and some state governments provide processes for these off-road users to obtain tax credits or refunds when tax-exempt fuel is unavailable, but these processes are susceptible to errors, omissions, and evasion. This paper examines data from 3 years for three types of refunds in Montana, but the results have implications for all states. The data indicate that mathematical errors and errors relating to the forms required to file for refunds most commonly plague the refund process. The data do not indicate that much evasion is occurring within the fuel tax refund process.

01499884

13-4944

English

pp 49–55

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309286848

Print

References (13) ; Tables (7)

Crimes; Errors; Fuel taxes; Offroad traffic

Fuel tax evasion; Tax refunds

Montana

Economics; Finance; Highways; Policy; I10: Economics and Administration

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:57PM

• Comparing Public–Private Partnerships with Conventional Procurement: Incorporating Considerations from Benefit–Cost Analysis
• Economic Assessment of Public Rest Areas and Traveler Information Centers on Limited-Access Freeways
• Integration of Congestion Pricing and Intertemporal Preference Rate in Social Welfare Function
• Key Considerations for States Seeking to Implement Public–Private Partnerships for New Highway Capacity
• Minimizing the Impacts of Cost and Revenue Uncertainties on Transportation Project Delivery
• Retail Fuel Price Stabilization and Revenue Generation of Dynamic Taxation Policy
• Transit Impact Fee: Enabling Statutes and Equity Concerns