01472747

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-17

http://scholar.google.com...lman&publication_year=2013

More than 2 million people in the United States use a wheelchair for mobility. These Americans not only rely on their assistive technology to complete simple, daily tasks, but they also depend on functional and accessible sidewalks to do so. Although the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines established by the Access Board provide suggestions for pathways, they are subjective and not measurable. This ambiguity results in public pathways with many bumps and cracks, which can lead to harmful whole body vibrations (WBVs) for wheelchair users. WBVs with a root mean squared (RMS) value greater than 1.6 m/s2 for more than a 1-h period may result in back and neck pain or muscle fatigue. For the development of a standard for surface roughness, subjective and objective information needs to be gathered and analyzed. Sixty-one subjects were recruited to travel over nine simulated wooden surfaces with varying roughnesses that were modeled after outdoor surfaces. A subset of the subjects also traveled over six outdoor surfaces. With the use of their own chairs, subjects traveled over each surface while accelerometers recorded vibrations at the seat, footrest, and backrest. After they traveled over each surface, subjects were asked to fill out a short questionnaire on the acceptability of each surface. The vibrations were converted to RMS accelerations. Both RMS accelerations and subject surface ratings were compared with surface roughness. As surface roughness increased, RMS accelerations increased, and subject surface ratings decreased. Some surfaces generated RMS accelerations above the 1.6 m/s2 threshold; this result suggested that some sidewalks caused harmful vibrations to wheelchair users.

01514640

13-4268

English

pp 149–156

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309287067

Print

Figures (8) ; Photos; References (9) ; Tables (4)

Comfort; Fatigue (Physiological condition); Field tests; Roughness; Standards; Vibration; Walkways; Wheelchairs

Whole body vibration

Design; Pavements; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Society; I22: Design of Pavements, Railways and Guideways

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:49PM

• Are Bikeshare Users Different from Regular Cyclists? A First Look at Short-Term Users, Annual Members, and Area Cyclists in the Washington, D.C., Region
• Assessment of Three Alternative Bicycle Infrastructure Quality-of-Service Metrics
• Bicycle-Specific Traffic Signals: Results from a State-of-the-Practice Review
• Built Environment and Household Electric Bike Ownership: Insights from Zhongshan Metropolitan Area, China
• Characteristics of Multimodal Conflicts in Urban On-Street Bicycle Lanes
• Commuter Cyclist Travel Behavior: Examination of the Impact of Changes in Weather
• Computer Vision Techniques for the Automated Collection of Cyclist Data
• Evaluation of Innovative Bicycle Facilities in Washington, D.C.: Pennsylvania Avenue Median Lanes and 15th Street Cycle Track
• Four Types of Cyclists? Examination of Typology for Better Understanding of Bicycling Behavior and Potential
• Is Evidence in Practice? Review of Driver and Cyclist Education Materials with Respect to Cycling Safety Evidence
• Methodology for Estimating Bicyclist Acceleration and Speed Distributions at Intersections
• Modeling of Passing Events in Mixed Bicycle Traffic with Cellular Automata
• North America’s First E-Bikeshare: A Year of Experience
• Public Bikesharing in North America: Early Operator Understanding and Emerging Trends
• Role of the Bicycle in the Limitation of Transport Poverty in the Netherlands
• Station-Level Forecasting of Bikesharing Ridership: Station Network Effects in Three U.S. Systems