01475222

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2352-05

http://scholar.google.com...ogan&publication_year=2013

The provision of bus priority is often a major consideration in on-street bus rapid transit design. However, the research is limited and suggests mixed outcomes. This paper explores the impact of bus priority treatments on road safety. An empirical analysis of accident data about bus rapid transit routes in Melbourne, Australia, was conducted. The analysis included an aggregate crash frequency analysis that accounted for statistical effects and a disaggregate analysis that used a safety audit and review of accident types. Overall, bus priority treatments reduced accidents, with a statistically significant reduction of 14.0%. The number of fatal and serious incidents dropped considerably (42 to 29 per annum). The disaggregate safety audit showed reductions in intolerable risks, but some concerns such as interaction of buses and traffic at bus lane setbacks (section of a curbside lane where traffic may enter to make a turn as the bus lane reaches an intersection) and greater pedestrian road-crossing distances caused by bus lanes. However, disaggregate analysis of accident type suggested that bus lanes act as a roadside buffer, reducing collisions with roadside objects and other vehicles. The shifting of stopping buses from the traffic lane into a bus lane was shown to reduce accidents. Bus lanes were thought to increase sight distances at unsignalized intersections and consequently reduce accidents with vehicles to the side. Some treatments were thought to increase traffic density, creating safety benefits through slowed traffic. These findings were statistically robust and suggest that a new perspective on planning for and justifying bus priority measures is warranted.

01521591

13-1129

English

pp 41–49

2013

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309294898

Print

Figures (2) ; Maps; References (38) ; Tables (10)

Bus priority; Bus rapid transit; Crash data; Crash rates; Crash severity; Fatalities; Highway safety; Pedestrian safety; Roadside; Safety audits; Traffic density; Unsignalized intersections

Melbourne (Australia)

Operations and Traffic Management; Public Transportation; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I82: Accidents and Transport Infrastructure

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 5 2013 12:19PM

• Benefits to the Academic Community of Standardization of Bus Transit Automatic Vehicle Location Data
• Comparing Fixed-Route and Demand-Responsive Feeder Transit Systems in Real-World Settings
• Designing Bus Rapid Transit Facilities for Constrained Urban Arterials: Case Study of the Selection Process for the Webster Avenue Bus Rapid Transit Running Way Design in New York City
• Dynamic Holding Strategy to Prevent Buses from Bunching
• Impact of Concessionary Bus Travel on the Well-Being of Older and Disabled People
• Implementation Cost Comparison of Electric Vehicle Energy Replenishment Technologies for Public Transit Bus Systems
• Improving Rail Station Access with Feeder Bus Network Optimization and Mode Shifts
• Measuring Bus Stop Dwell Time and Time Lost Serving Stop with London iBus Automatic Vehicle Location Data
• Metropolitan Transit Agency’s Experience Operating General-Public Demand-Responsive Transit
• Model for the Optimal Location of Bus Stops and Its Application to a Public Transport Corridor in Santiago, Chile
• Modeling the Spatial Effects on Demand Estimation of Americans with Disabilities Act Paratransit Services
• Operations of a Taxi Fleet for Advance Reservations Using Electric Vehicles and Charging Stations
• Planning Dial-a-Ride Services: Statistical and Meta-Modeling Approach
• Public Transport Time-Tabling Based on Maximum-Load Points Using Multisize Vehicles
• Simulation-Based Planning Framework for Choosing Where to Implement Bus Signal Priority in Mixed-Mode Operations
• Transit Assignment Model Incorporating Bus Dwell Time