01372731

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2277-06

http://scholar.google.com...cher&publication_year=2012

To foster a greater understanding of the composition and preferences of travelers served by discount curbside bus operators, this study summarizes the results of a survey of such passengers. The study compares the characteristics of passengers using the two largest operators, BoltBus and Megabus, with those using conventional bus lines such as Greyhound. Surveys were administered in the three most heavily served curbside bus markets in the East and Midwest of the United States—six cities in total—and the result was a cumulative sample of 1,025 responses. Curbside bus service was shown to have generated much new travel, with newly generated trips accounting for 22.0% of all passengers. In the East, however, curbside bus service is taking many travelers from passenger trains. More than a third of those surveyed (34.0%) report that they would have ridden trains had curbside buses not been available. In all markets surveyed, ridership heavily comprised passengers in the group 18 to 25 years of age and was overwhelmingly made up of passengers traveling for pleasure or personal matters rather than for business. When the findings are interpreted broadly, they support the notion that the curbside bus phenomenon is not primarily the result of a shift in market share from conventional bus lines. The evidence instead suggests that curbside bus service should be regarded as a new mode that attracts most of its passengers from commercial flights, trains, and private automobiles and that it has grown dramatically, despite the relative lack of business travelers.

01453431

12-3838

English

pp 49–56

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309223317

Print

Figures; References; Tables

Bus transportation; Demographics; Discount fares; Intercity bus lines; Modal shift; Ridership; Travel surveys

Curbside operators

East Coast (United States); Midwestern States

Motor Carriers; Passenger Transportation; Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 5:19PM

• Automatic Identification of Vehicles with Faulty Automatic Vehicle Location and Control Units in London Buses’ iBus System
• Comparative Study of Emissions from Bus Rapid Transit and Conventional Bus Systems: Case Study from Beijing
• Evaluation of Zoning Design with Transfers for Paratransit Services
• Grouping of Bus Stops for Aggregation of Route-Level Passenger Origin–Destination Flow Matrices
• Optimization of Spacing of Transit Stops on a Realistic Street Network
• Role of Public Transportation as Job Access Mode: Lessons from Survey of People with Disabilities in New Jersey
• Select Bus Service on M15 in New York City: Bus Rapid Transit Partnership
• Sharing the Costs of Human Services Transportation
• Taxicabs as Public Transportation in Boston, Massachusetts
• User Needs for Urban Car Travel: Can Demand-Responsive Transport Break Dependence on the Car?