TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Public–Private Partnerships: When Are They Appropriate for Transportation Infrastructure?

Accession Number:

01367752

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/168301.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780309223287

Abstract:

Proposed restrictions on federal funding for surface transportation projects are forcing state and local governments to consider alternative funding and financing mechanisms. The Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery and Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act and other programs have successfully leveraged private dollars, but other programs are still needed to fund the surface transportation infrastructure gap. The U.S. Department of Transportation has been exploring new programs for innovative financing; one is public–private partnerships (P3s). P3s allow private firms to participate in the financing of an infrastructure project and take either part or all of the business risks and earn a market return on their investment as compensation. Conclusions from this analysis are the following. First, although accurate revenue forecasts are essential if a project is to be a success, making accurate estimates of revenues has proved difficult. Second, the success of any P3 depends on accurate measurement and sharing of risk. Deals that place all risk on the private sector are likely to fail. Projects in which the public sector takes more of the business risk are more likely to succeed. Third, public outreach, explanation, and strategic communication are essential, especially if the privatization will result in significant pricing changes for users. Fourth, due diligence and a thorough cost–benefit analysis are essential for public and private parties. Private firms typically have more experience in P3s and project financing. The public sector must have similar information and may need to contract out the cost analysis procedures. Fifth, if a project generates a revenue stream, then a private firm is more likely to embrace a P3 agreement.

Monograph Title:

Freight Systems 2012

Monograph Accession #:

01450931

Report/Paper Numbers:

12-1738

Language:

English

Authors:

Resor, Randolph R
Tuszynski, Nick

Pagination:

pp 40–47

Publication Date:

2012

Serial:

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Issue Number: 2288
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

9780309223287

Media Type:

Print

Features:

References; Tables

Subject Areas:

Finance; Freight Transportation; Highways; Public Transportation; Railroads; I10: Economics and Administration

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Feb 8 2012 5:05PM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: