01366032

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2314-02

http://scholar.google.com...tell&publication_year=2012

The performance of a pedestrian safety device, the rectangular rapid flash beacon (RRFB), was evaluated at a street crossing of Florida’s Pinellas Trail, a shared-use path where the majority of trail users were bicyclists. An elevated video camera beside the trail and several hundred feet from the crossing was used to collect before-and-after data for more than 1,000 bicyclists and pedestrians. The delay before trail users began to cross was reduced after the RRFB was installed. Bicyclists and pedestrians yielded considerably less, and motorists considerably more, after the installation. Yielding by motorists increased from 2% before to 35% after installation of the RRFB. When the flasher was activated, motorist yielding was 54%. In the before period, 82% of trail users were able to cross the intersection, whereas 18% were trapped in the middle. In the after period, these values were 94% and 6%, respectively. Installation of the RRFB increased the safety of trail users at the crossing. However, the device is not fail-safe, and communities that use it at trail crossings should be aware of this limitation. Education could help increase the percentage of trail users who push the button to activate the RRFB and increase motorist knowledge about the requirement to yield to pedestrians at crossings. Periodic police enforcement or the development of a passive detection system could also be helpful.

01469431

12-1637

English

pp 7–13

2012

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309263122

Print

Figures; Photos; References

Behavior; Bicycle crossings; Bikeways; Cyclists; Drivers; Flashing beacons; Highway safety; Pedestrians; Traffic control devices; Trails; Yielding

Shared use facilities

Saint Petersburg (Florida)

Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I85: Safety Devices used in Transport Infrastructure

PRP, TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 8 2012 5:03PM

• Airports and Bicycles: What Are Obstacles to and Incentives for Improving Bicycle Access?
• Analysis of Factors Influencing Bicycle–Vehicle Interactions on Urban Roadways by Ordered Probit Regression
• Are Longitudinal Data Unavoidable? Measuring Variation in Bicycle Mode Choice
• Assessment of Communitywide Bikeability with Bicycle Level of Service
• Better Understanding of Factors Influencing Likelihood of Using Shared Bicycle Systems and Frequency of Use
• Electric Bikes and Transportation Policy: Insights from Early Adopters
• Estimating Latent Cycling Trips in Montreal, Canada
• Factors That Influence University Employees to Commute by Bicycle
• Investigating Behavior of Active Cyclists: Influences on Bicycle Commuting
• Lateral Placement of Motor Vehicles When Passing Bicyclists: Assessing Influence of Centerline Rumble Strips
• Multiuser Perspectives on Separated, On-Street Bicycle Infrastructure
• Relationships Between Self-Reported Bicycling Injuries and Perceived Risk of Cyclists in Queensland, Australia
• To Bike or Not to Bike: Seasonal Factors for Bicycle Commuting
• Traffic Safety for Electric Bike Riders in China: Attitudes, Risk Perception, and Aberrant Riding Behaviors
• Traveler Perspectives of Greenway Quality in Northern New England