TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Case Study: Washington I-405 Corridor Program: Reinventing NEPA
Cover of Case Study: Washington I-405 Corridor Program: Reinventing NEPA

Accession Number:

01339661

Record Type:

Monograph

Abstract:

The Interstate 405 (I-405) Corridor Program, named Reinventing NEPA, was a pilot study for an improved transportation decision-making process developed by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that attempted to move the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decision making into the early stages of long-range planning. WSDOT engaged the affected regulatory agencies and jurisdictions by introducing a series of coordination and consensus points at key milestones and decision points throughout the environmental analysis, documentation, and review process. WSDOT developed the I-405 Corridor Program as a programmatic environmental impact statement (EIS). A programmatic EIS, or Tier I EIS, reviews the broad environmental impacts of a long-term investment program such as multiple improvements along a major transportation corridor. Subsequent project-specific, or Tier II, EISs then review the impacts of individual projects. This approach allowed WSDOT to focus on broad corridorwide transportation issues and policy-level decisions, such as service characteristics of the corridor, corridor selection, general location of improvements, and combinations of improvements to solve corridorwide transportation problems. The I-405 Corridor Program successfully moved NEPA decisions into the planning phase. Stakeholders agree that the I-405 Corridor Program was successful because NEPA decisions were effectively made in the planning process. This achievement is helping to streamline project development and environmental review of the individual projects currently under way. The early involvement of state and federal regulatory resource agencies improved coordination between agencies, and a transparent decision-making process helped build the relationships and trust that continue today. This case study is discussed under the following headings: Executive Summary; Background; Institutional Framework for Decision Making; Transportation Decision-Making Process and Key Decisions; Lessons Learned; and Conclusions.

Supplemental Notes:

Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

Strategic Highway Research Program 2, 500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Pagination:

26p

Publication Date:

2011

Media Type:

Web

Features:

Figures (3) ; Maps (1) ; References (7) ; Tables (1)

Geographic Terms:

Subject Areas:

Environment; Highways; Planning and Forecasting; I15: Environment; I21: Planning of Transport Infrastructure

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

May 11 2011 11:31AM