01332996

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2216-13

http://scholar.google.com...ylor&publication_year=2011

A large and growing body of research suggests that transit users hate to wait. Given broad policy goals to increase public transit use in U.S. cities, this research sheds light on cost-effective ways to increase transit use by decreasing the perceived burdens of waiting at stops and stations. The goal of this study was to determine (a) the relative importance of stop and station amenities and attributes and (b) how the importance of these amenities and attributes varies with wait time. For this goal to be accomplished and for the duration of wait time when amenities become important to be determined a transit user survey that asked more than 2,000 travelers to rate both the importance of amenities at their stops or stations and their wait times was analyzed. Regardless of wait time, safety and on-time performance were paramount to riders; these also ranked highest relative to all other station and stop amenities examined. Lighting, cleanliness, information, shelter, and the presence of guards were less important to travelers when waits were short, but were more important with longer wait times. Thus, improving service frequency and reliability reduces the need for amenities at stations. This end suggests that when transit managers have a choice and when riders feel safe and secure managers should favor service improvements over station and stop amenities. Finally, some amenities become more important with long wait times, such as restrooms and food and drink facilities. Although provision of basic needs amenities is intuitive, restrooms and food and drink sales are most likely present at high-passenger-volume, high-service-frequency stops and stations, where they are valued least by travelers.

01361754

11-3973

English

pp 116-124

2011

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309167659

Print

Figures (2) ; References (19) ; Tables (4)

On time performance; Public transit; Rail transit stations; Station operations; Transit operating agencies; Transit operators; Waiting time

Amenities

Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 17 2011 6:42PM

• Algorithm to Measure Daily Bus Passenger Miles Using Electronic Farebox Data for National Transit Database Section 15 Reporting
• Analysis of Transit Service Coverage Level-of-Service Measures at Border Regions and Suggested Alternative Procedure
• Customer Loyalty and Chicago, Illinois, Transit Authority Buses: Results from 2008 Customer Satisfaction Survey
• Determinants of Delay Incident Occurrence of Urban Metros
• Development and Application of Rail Transit Capacity Models in Taiwan
• Development of Key Performance Indicator to Compare Regularity of Service Between Urban Bus Operators
• Identifying Homogeneous Periods in Bus Route Origin-Destination Passenger Flow Patterns From Automatic Passenger Counter Data
• Impacts of Holding Control Strategies on Transit Performance: Bus Simulation Model Analysis
• Integrated Multimodel Evaluation of Transit Bus Emissions in Toronto, Canada
• Measurement of Travel Fatigue: Objective Monitoring and Subjective Estimation
• Measuring and Controlling Subway Fare Evasion: Improving Safety and Security at New York City Transit Authority
• Modeling Transit Rider Preferences for Contactless Bank Cards as Fare Media: Transport for London and the Chicago, Illinois, Transit Authority
• North Carolina Ferry System: A Study
• Sampling of Redistribution of Empty Vehicles for Personal Rapid Transit
• Scheduling of Feeder Vehicles for Intermodal Services for Special Events
• Uncovering San Francisco, California, Muni’s Proof-of-Payment Patterns to Help Reduce Fare Evasion
• Visualization of Geographical Information System and Automatic Vehicle Location Data to Explore Transit Performance
• Will Psychological Effects of Real-time Transit Information Systems Lead to Ridership Gain?