TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Do Advance Yield Markings Increase Safe Driver Behaviors at Unsignalized, Marked Midblock Crosswalks? Driving Simulator Study

Accession Number:

01333464

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/166763.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780309223010

Abstract:

In the United States, 78% of pedestrian crashes occur at nonintersection crossings. As a result, unsignalized, marked midblock crosswalks are prime targets for remediation. Many of these crashes occur under sight-limited conditions in which the view of critical information by the driver or pedestrian is obstructed by a vehicle stopped in an adjacent travel or parking lane on the near side of the crosswalk. Study of such a situation on the open road is much too risky, but study of the situation in a driving simulator is not. This paper describes the development of scenarios with sight limitations to compare potential vehicle–pedestrian conflicts on a driving simulator under conditions with two different types of pavement markings. Under the first condition, advance yield markings and symbol signs (prompts) that indicated “yield here to pedestrians” were used to warn drivers of pedestrians at marked, midblock crosswalks. Under the second condition, standard crosswalk treatments and prompts were used to warn drivers of these hazards. Actual crashes as well as the drivers’ point of gaze were measured to determine if the drivers approaching a marked midblock crosswalk looked for pedestrians in the crosswalk more frequently and sooner in high-risk scenarios when advance yield markings and prompts were present than when standard markings and prompts were used. Fewer crashes were found to occur with advance yield markings. Drivers were also found to look for pedestrians much more frequently and much sooner with advance yield markings. The advantages and limitations of the use of driving simulation to study problems such as these are discussed.

Monograph Title:

Pedestrians 2011

Monograph Accession #:

01365021

Report/Paper Numbers:

11-2518

Language:

English

Authors:

Gomez, Radhameris A
Samuel, Siby
Gerardino, Luis Roman
Romoser, Matthew R E
Collura, John
Knodler, Michael
Fisher, Donald L

Pagination:

pp 27-33

Publication Date:

2011

Serial:

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Issue Number: 2264
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

9780309223010

Media Type:

Print

Features:

Figures (4) ; Photos (2) ; References (12) ; Tables (2)

Uncontrolled Terms:

Subject Areas:

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Feb 17 2011 6:11PM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: