01334344

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2250-10

http://scholar.google.com...+Luo&publication_year=2011

Each year numerous pedestrian and bicyclist crashes involving high injury levels are reported at highway–rail grade crossings (HRGCs) across the United States. Such crashes are invariably the result of errors on the part of the pedestrians and bicyclists. The focus of this paper is to investigate pedestrian and bicyclist violations at a dual-quadrant gated HRGC and to report on four types of gate violations, including factors associated with those violations. For both pedestrians and bicyclists, the violations studied were (a) passing under descending gates, (b) passing around fully lowered gates, (c) passing under ascending gates, and (d) passing around fully lowered gates between successive trains. Data on pedestrian and bicyclist violations were collected at a grade crossing in Nebraska through the use of video surveillance. Analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in the mean frequencies of pedestrian and bicyclist violations at HRGCs. When data for pedestrians and bicyclists were pooled, 1.27 gate-related violations were recorded per crossing event. Children of around 8 years of age or younger were involved in 25% more gate-related violations than older crossing users (pedestrians and bicyclists). Violations increased with the presence of more individuals at the crossing during train crossing events, but the contribution from young children was greater than that from older crossing users. The implications of the findings for HRGC safety are discussed.

01360546

11-1443

English

pp 76-82

2011

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309167703

Print

Photos (1) ; References (14) ; Tables (5)

Age groups; Children; Cyclists; Highway safety; Pedestrian movement; Pedestrian safety; Pedestrians; Railroad grade crossings; Risk assessment; Traffic surveillance; Traffic violations; Video cameras

Bicycle safety; Gated crossings

Nebraska

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 17 2011 5:48PM

• Detection Distances to Crosswalk Markings: Transverse Lines, Continental Markings, and Bar Pairs
• Determining the Effectiveness of an Advanced LED Warning System for Rural Intersections
• Driver Preference for Crosswalk Marking Patterns
• Evaluation of Lighted Pavement Marker Stop Bars at Intersections with Light Rail Lines
• Field Evaluation of In-Lane Pavement Markings in Advance of Freeway Interchanges
• Guidelines for the Use of Pavement Marking Symbols at Freeway Interchanges
• LED Streetlight Application Assessment Project: Pilot Study in Seattle, Washington (With Discussion and Closure)
• Malfunction Flash Mode Policies and Practice
• Safety Effectiveness of Actuated Advance Warning Systems