01337945

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2247-12

http://scholar.google.com...aves&publication_year=2011

A key issue for both sustainable transport and public health is the viability of cycling as an alternative to the car, particularly for short trips. This study assessed the travel time implications of hypothetically substituting actual car trips with cycling. The car trips were captured over several weeks for 178 motorists in Sydney, Australia, through Global Positioning System technology. The cycling trips were generated with reverse geocoding processes in geographic information system software. This process took into account the impacts of terrain on cycling travel times. Both individual trips and trip chains were considered. Results suggested that for an inexperienced adult cyclist more than 90% of car trips of up to 5 km (58% of trips) could be cycled within 10 min of the time taken by car. As the level of cycling experience increased, the bikeable distance increased: the majority of commuter adults could cycle the median commuting distance in Sydney of 11 km with little additional travel time compared with a car. For trip chains, although the competitiveness of cycling decreased as more legs were included, the total distance of the chain emerged as a more crucial issue. Cycling was found to be as competitive for trip chains shorter than 10 km as for individual shorter trips. Finally, results showed that in the context of daily travel time budgets, approximately 20% of people could switch totally from cars to bicycles without incurring more than a 20-min additional increase in travel time on average per day.

01361562

11-1358

English

pp 99-108

2011

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309167673

Print

Figures (10) ; References (25) ; Tables (1)

Bicycle commuting; Bicycling; Cyclists; Geographic information systems; Global Positioning System; Modal shift; Travel time; Trip chaining; Trip length

Experience

Sydney (Australia)

Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Planning and Forecasting; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 17 2011 5:46PM

• Are Cycle Centers Effective Transport Interventions? Evaluating King George Square Cycle Center in Brisbane, Australia
• Bicycle Parking Analysis with Time Series Photography
• Bikeability and the 20-min Neighborhood: How Infrastructure and Destinations Influence Bicycle Accessibility
• China’s Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and Behavioral Response to Bikesharing
• Estimating Potential Effect of Speed Limits, Built Environment, and Other Factors on Severity of Pedestrian and Cyclist Injuries in Crashes
• Evaluation of Shared Lane Markings in Cambridge, Massachusetts
• How Do Level of Experience, Purpose for Riding, and Preference for Facilities Affect Location of Riding? Study of Adult Bicycle Riders in Queensland, Australia
• Impact of Bicycle Lane Characteristics on Exposure of Bicyclists to Traffic-Related Particulate Matter
• Intersection Crossing Times of Bicyclists: Quantitative Measurements at Diverse Intersections
• Much-Anticipated Marriage of Cycling and Transit: How Will It Work?
• Pilot Models for Estimating Bicycle Intersection Volumes
• Uniform Vehicle Code and State Statutes Governing Bicycling, 2010: Analysis of Definitions and Statutes
• Weather or Not to Cycle: Temporal Trends and Impact of Weather on Cycling in an Urban Environment