01338026

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2247-10

http://scholar.google.com...reno&publication_year=2011

Road facilities in urban areas are a major source of injury for nonmotorized road users despite the benefits of nonmotorized transportation. In particular, large Canadian cities such as Montreal face serious problems with pedestrian and cyclist safety. To address these problems, funds are continually allocated through different safety improvement programs such as reduction of speed limits, improvement of intersections, and increased traffic enforcement. However, few analytical tools help to identify and quantify the benefits of countermeasures (e.g., roadway design, speed management strategies, or land use policies) in reducing accident frequency and severity. Injury severity models were developed to determine the effects of road design, built environment, speed limits, and other factors (e.g., vehicle characteristics and movement type) on injury severity levels of pedestrians and cyclists involved in collisions with motor vehicles. Sources of data included police reports describing vehicle–pedestrian and vehicle–cyclist collisions, as well as information on land use, transit network, and road design attributes from the city of Montreal. The impacts of road design, land use, built environment, and other strategies on the injury severity levels of vulnerable road users were investigated. Factors such as darkness, vehicle movement, whether an accident occurred at an intersection, vehicle type, and land use mix affected the severity of pedestrian injuries from collisions. For cyclists, however, only vehicle movement and whether the accident occurred at a signalized intersection had significant effects on the severity of the injury.

01361562

11-1247

English

pp 81-90

2011

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309167673

Print

Figures (1) ; References (12) ; Tables (7)

Bicycle crashes; Built environment; Countermeasures; Crash causes; Crash characteristics; Crash injuries; Crash victims; Cyclists; Highway design; Injury severity; Land use; Pedestrian vehicle crashes; Pedestrians; Speed limits

Montreal (Canada)

Highways; Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Safety and Human Factors; I84: Personal Injuries

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Feb 17 2011 5:44PM

• Are Cycle Centers Effective Transport Interventions? Evaluating King George Square Cycle Center in Brisbane, Australia
• Bicycle Parking Analysis with Time Series Photography
• Bikeability and the 20-min Neighborhood: How Infrastructure and Destinations Influence Bicycle Accessibility
• China’s Hangzhou Public Bicycle: Understanding Early Adoption and Behavioral Response to Bikesharing
• Evaluation of Shared Lane Markings in Cambridge, Massachusetts
• How Do Level of Experience, Purpose for Riding, and Preference for Facilities Affect Location of Riding? Study of Adult Bicycle Riders in Queensland, Australia
• Impact of Bicycle Lane Characteristics on Exposure of Bicyclists to Traffic-Related Particulate Matter
• Intersection Crossing Times of Bicyclists: Quantitative Measurements at Diverse Intersections
• Much-Anticipated Marriage of Cycling and Transit: How Will It Work?
• Pilot Models for Estimating Bicycle Intersection Volumes
• Travel Time Competitiveness of Cycling in Sydney, Australia
• Uniform Vehicle Code and State Statutes Governing Bicycling, 2010: Analysis of Definitions and Statutes
• Weather or Not to Cycle: Temporal Trends and Impact of Weather on Cycling in an Urban Environment