TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Predicting Simulator Adaptation Syndrome from Driver Visual Characteristics

Accession Number:

01156948

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Abstract:

Driving simulators allow researchers to maximize control and replicability while minimizing the risk of injury to the driver and other road users. These advantages, however, are offset by the possible development of simulator adaptation syndrome (SAS), characterized by negative physical side effects such as headache or nausea. The theory that SAS may be caused by conflicting cues between the visual and vestibular systems and by simulators’ visual display features suggests the driver’s visual abilities may be important in determining SAS susceptibility. The present study investigated the predictability of SAS from driver visual characteristics in participants with neurological diseases (Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, sleep apnea, stroke) and neurologically unimpaired drivers. SAS was assessed using a standard questionnaire tool measuring discomfort along several dimensions (headache, eyestrain, nervousness, boredom, sleepiness, dizziness, light-headedness, increased body temperature, nausea) in subjects who participated in drives in an interactive, fixed-base driving simulator. Multiple linear regressions were used to determine the relationship between driver visual characteristics, specifically far visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and useful field of view (UFOV), and simulator discomfort. Neurological condition, UFOV condition, and contrast sensitivity did not significantly predict SAS. While drivers with worse far visual acuity reported greater eyestrain and boredom, drivers with better far visual acuity reported more dizziness, lightheadedness, and nausea. In short, it appears that poorer vision protects against SAS. The authors suggest visual and vestibular conflict may be greater in drivers with better visual acuity because of the greater number of potential conflicting cues being received by their visual system.

Monograph Accession #:

01147878

Report/Paper Numbers:

10-1747

Language:

English

Corporate Authors:

Transportation Research Board

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States

Authors:

Emerson, Jamie
Dawson, Jeffrey
Uc, Ergun Y
Anderson, Steven W
Rizzo, Matthew

Pagination:

15p

Publication Date:

2010

Conference:

Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting

Location: Washington DC, United States
Date: 2010-1-10 to 2010-1-14
Sponsors: Transportation Research Board

Media Type:

DVD

Features:

References (34) ; Tables (6)

Subject Areas:

Highways; Safety and Human Factors; I83: Accidents and the Human Factor

Source Data:

Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2010 Paper #10-1747

Files:

TRIS, TRB

Created Date:

Jan 25 2010 10:47AM