01154781

Component

https://doi.org/10.3141/2145-03

http://scholar.google.com...dale&publication_year=2010

Despite an overwhelming case for the redevelopment of historically based bus networks, reviews are difficult to implement because of limited funding, equity concerns, complex technical challenges, difficulty in communicating technical issues to stakeholders, and potential displacement of existing users. This paper describes a bus network review process designed in Melbourne, Australia, to address these issues. The process adopts evidence-based planning and achieves a consensus of outcomes by using an inclusive design process with advanced analysis tools to communicate technical issues effectively to a nontechnical audience. Previous research does not directly address the practical implementation of bus review processes and tends either to focus on short-term bus planning approaches or to consider theoretical applications with limited practical value. The bus network review process developed is based on strategic studies aimed at opportunities to grow bus markets. The process is highly consultative to build stakeholder buy-in and adopts a two-stage program of (a) problem identification inputs and (b) draft network review inputs using nominal group techniques to ensure inclusive participation and quantification of outputs. The review process uses a simple-to-understand hierarchy approach to review services including assessment of access, time factors, ease of use, safety, and awareness. Graphical techniques including geographic information systems are adopted for clear and simple presentation of technical outputs. The process has been powerful in building buy-in and has resulted in A$1.4 billion (US$1.3 billion) of investment in improved services with high ridership growth outcomes. Experience and effects, including areas for future research, are outlined.

01164463

10-0503

English

pp 18-29

2010

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

9780309142786

Print

Figures; Maps; References (32)

Bus transit; Communication; Evaluation and assessment; Geographic information systems; Network analysis (Planning); Restructuring; Stakeholders

Graphical techniques

Melbourne (Australia)

Planning and Forecasting; Public Transportation; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning

TRIS, TRB

Jan 25 2010 10:16AM

• An Assessment of Demand for Rural Intercity Transportation Services in a Changing Environment
• Bus Network Planning for Transfers and the Network Effect in Melbourne, Australia
• Classifying Rural and Small Urban Transit Agencies
• Developing a Bus Rapid Transit Strategic Plan for San Jose and Silicon Valley, California
• Developing an Information Management System for Public and Specialized Transportation Providers of Illinois: A Web-Based, Interactive System
• Development and Evaluation of a Coordinated and Conditional Bus Priority Approach
• Direct Ridership Model of Bus Rapid Transit in Los Angeles County, California
• Effects of Basic Rural Paratransit Characteristics on Organizational Culture
• Iterative Proportional Fitting Procedure to Determine Bus Route Passenger Origin–Destination Flows
• Safety of Public Transportation Occupational Drivers: Risk Perception, Attitudes, and Driving Behavior
• Select Bus Service on Bx12 in New York City: Bus Rapid Transit Partnership of New York City DOT and Metropolitan Transit Authority New York City Transit
• Space Requirements for Wheeled Mobility Devices in Public Transportation: Analysis of Clear Floor Space Requirements