TRB Pubsindex
Text Size:

Title:

Full Bayes Approach to Before-and-After Safety Evaluation with Matched Comparisons: Case Study of Stop-Sign In-Fill Program

Accession Number:

01153414

Record Type:

Component

Availability:

Transportation Research Board Business Office

500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001 United States
Order URL: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/Highway...alysis_and_Evaluation_2010_V_163895.aspx

Find a library where document is available


Order URL: http://worldcat.org/isbn/9780309142793

Abstract:

The full Bayes (FB) approach has recently been proposed for evaluating road safety treatments in before-and-after studies. In recognition of the advantages of the FB method and because of the lack of sufficient data to develop the safety performance function necessary to conduct an empirical Bayes study, the FB approach is used to determine the effectiveness of the Stop-Sign In-Fill (SSIF) program of the Canadian Insurance Corporation of British Columbia. The SSIF program funds the conversion from uncontrolled residential intersections to two-way stop-controlled intersections in an alternating pattern. This alternating pattern provides consistency in the application of stop signs within a residential neighborhood. Different modeling formulations for the before-and-after evaluation were investigated, and the results were compared with those of the traditional approach. No postprocessing of the results is required to achieve the odds ratio. The FB analysis revealed an overall significant reduction in predicted collision frequency of 51.1% with the credible interval (36.8%, 62.3%) at the 0.95 confidence level. It was also found that incorporating such design features as matched yoked comparison groups in collision prediction models may significantly improve the fit, while reducing the need to account for overdispersion. The results of the traditional technique were compatible with those of the FB approach at the overall level. It seems that the random selection of sites, which reduces the regression-to-the-mean effect, is the reason that both approaches gave relatively similar overall level results. However, the two methods produced quite different results at the zone (site) level.

Monograph Accession #:

01164464

Report/Paper Numbers:

10-0219

Language:

English

Authors:

El-Basyouny, Karim
Sayed, Tarek

Pagination:

pp 1-8

Publication Date:

2010

Serial:

Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board

Issue Number: 2148
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISSN: 0361-1981

ISBN:

9780309142793

Media Type:

Print

Features:

Figures (1) ; References (26) ; Tables (3)

Geographic Terms:

Subject Areas:

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Safety and Human Factors; I73: Traffic Control; I81: Accident Statistics

Files:

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Created Date:

Jan 25 2010 10:10AM

More Articles from this Serial Issue: