01478203

Component

http://www.accessmanageme...s%20for%20AM%20-%20New.pdf

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the following: (1) The process of performing an Indirect and Cumulative Effects (ICE) Analysis; (2) Factors that make this particular ICE Analysis unique; (3) The role that a Geographic Information System (GIS) played; and (4) The different effects that could occur based on the proposed alternatives This ICE Analysis was performed for the Intercounty Connector Project, located in portions of Montgomery and Prince George’s County, just outside of Washington DC. The proposed six-lane roadway would span approximately 20 miles from I-270 to I-95. Two build alternatives (Corridor 1 and Corridor 2) where evaluated as part of this analysis along with the No-Action alternative. Corridor 1 or the southern alternative extends approximately 18 miles from I-370/I-270 near the Shady Grove Metrorail Station to I-95 and US 1 south of Laurel. Approximately 16 of the 18 miles are located in Montgomery County and approximately 2 miles are in Prince George’s County. Corridor 1 is consistent with local master plans. Corridor 2 or the northern alternative extends approximately 20 miles from I-370/I-270 near the Shady Grove Metrorail Station to I-95/US 1 south of Laurel. Approximately 16 of the 20 miles are located in Montgomery County and approximately 4 miles are in Prince George’s County (Figure 1). Corridor 2 is not consistent with local master plans.

01475101

English

15p

2008

8th National Conference on Access Management

Digital/other

Maps; References

Access control (Transportation); Geographic information systems; Infrastructure; Land use planning; Transportation planning

Intercounty Connector (Maryland)

Maryland

Highways; Operations and Traffic Management; Planning and Forecasting; Safety and Human Factors; I72: Traffic and Transport Planning; I73: Traffic Control

TRIS, TRB, ATRI

Apr 8 2013 11:22AM

• Access Management Considerations for High Capacity Multi-Lane Roundabout Design and Implementation
• Access Management: Past, Present, and Future
• An Update on Superstreet Implementation and Research
• Criteria for Selecting Access Management Performance Measures
• Development of CARTS Access Management Standards using the TRB Access Management Manual
• Driveways, Parking, Bicycles, and Pedestrians: Balancing Safety and Efficiency
• Franklin County Access Management Guidebook
• Geometric Design of Driveways Update
• Impacts of Access Management Case Study: Dave Ward Drive, Hwy 60, Conway, AR
• Implementing MoDOT’s Access Management Guidelines Along Route 763
• Improving Safety and Operations by Limiting Access on Virginia Route 28
• Intersection and Junction Fatalities in the Context of Access Management
• Issues Relating to the Geometric Design of Intersections
• Minnesota Trunk Highway 10 Anoka County Business Stakeholder Involvement Process
• NW 86th Street Access Management Plan: Complexities of Managing Access with Plans, Land Redevelopment, and Street Redesign
• Prioritizing Access Management Implementation
• Tying Transportation Improvements, Future Land Use, Access Management and Zoning Regulations Together for Successful Implementation